Trust me buddy, @ work i use Athlon 64 FX-74 - 3.0GHz and Core 2 Duo E6850 - 3.0GHz , and AMD Opteron workstation...
During CAD rendering or 3ds max rendering, i go with Athlon 64 FX. it just starts the rendering and FINISH it, NO noise, no need to Restart or system crash... Bt Interl core due Extreme edition is just annoying, It does the job, but it scares the crap outta me, Data lose, sometimes stucks, sometimes restarts, makes lot of noise...
But when it comes to multi tasking (I MEAN REAL MULTI TASKING) (scaning, gameing, rendering...) at the same time, i go with my Opteron workstation... ITS SLOWER relative to Athlone FX, but u can do heck of a stuff at the same time...
Intel is just too expensive than AMD, and AMD's job is much better for me...
Now if u r intel guy, then god bless intel, go with intel;)
am just talkin since i use all three of em... ;)
2007-09-24 07:43:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
John has absolutely no clue.
All his answers are half butt answers.
These are the system requirements for Autocad 2007
* Intel® Pentium® IV recommended
* Microsoft® Windows® XP Home & Professional SP1 or SP2, Windows XP for Tablet PC
* SP2, or Windows® 2000 SP3 or SP4
* 512 MB RAM
* 750 MB free disk space for installation
* 1024x768 VGA with True Color
* Microsoft® Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1 or higher
You can se its not really requiring too much, so even your computers from 2-3 years agao can handle this thing comfortably.
But more importantly, if you start doing really intensive graphics, it will be your video ram and wehther you have enough system ram to go around, thats going to be more important that worrying about your procesor.
And heres a hint -- dont listen to dull john.
2007-09-23 22:59:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by writersbIock2006 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sorry, yet no. Your GPU does not have adequate VRAM, and whether it did, it may nevertheless be too slow. something of your specs are stable nonetheless, so in case you hook it as much as an exterior GPU, you *would desire to* have the skill to play
2016-12-17 09:00:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering you can get an Intel quad core Q6600 for about half the price of one of those dual CPU AMD FX-70 setups the last guy was talking about, I don't know why he would say Intel is too expensive. The Q6600 also happens to be faster at half the price, so the decision is easy, go with the Q6600.
2007-09-24 15:12:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by mysticman44 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
There is no "best processor" for any task, there is only power and affordability.
2007-09-23 22:55:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dull Jon 6
·
0⤊
4⤋