Isn't it time that we stopped making the unquestionable and unstinting supprt of Israel the chief objective of our policy in the middle east?
The state of Israel has the right to its existence. They have a right to defend that existence and a right to seek help and alliances to protect themselves.
But I object to the protection of Israel being the cornerstone
for our foreign policy in that area of the world.
Many of the Arab and Iranian aspirations are legitimate and we would have done the world -and first and foremost ourselves! - a big favour if we had considered those aspirations pragmatically and objectively,with OUR best interests in mind and not Israel's.
We have alienated a whole people (who just happen to sit on some of the most valuable real estate in terms of energy supply on the whole planet) and have violated many of the precepts and values we hold most dear and most American just to back a foreign country.
Please, your thoughts?racial slurs and name calling not welcome
2007-09-23
22:47:47
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
To kelvinistic.I'm impressed. You are right on the ball. So few people even know(less care9about the shameful USS Liberty incident when Israel fired on our ship . There are about 60 Israeli spies in our jails who will get get lightly slapped on the wrist and after a few months get sent back to Israel. There are Israeli dual -citizens advising the president and the state department.
to someone who objected to the term¨51st state¨,it's a question,not an affirmation.
2007-09-24
02:17:14 ·
update #1