I understand that it's part of the game as Man U had 2 chances of penalty and 2 of red card and the referee awarded them with 1 red card and 1 penalty but I only blame the coach because he was playing against the best coach in England since Mourinho is no longer there and he should then react immediately once Man U scored but he wasted time to let his fellow countryman and the owner's fellow friend play as i believe they were both one of the main reason we deserved nothing.
I prefer Alex rather than Ben Haim because he doesn't just defend but also attacks like Terry and Carvalho.
2007-09-23 20:28:42 · 13 answers · asked by Invasion 3 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
YOU GOT BEAT. SIMPLE AS THAT.
2007-09-24 04:18:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is really a retort to both the first and second answerer:-
Samantha T,
Get back to the middle of the table? Have you ever watch football? Or do you watch American football? Chelsea deserves to be part of the top teams. Most football critics will agree. So just shut your f*cking mouth when you don't know what is good football. And if you want to see a real diver, look at a certain C. Ronaldo-he's good enough to get an Oscar too.
luscious_linz,
Chelsea are dirty players? What game are we talking about? Football is a dirty game. Any contact game is. Chelsea never played dirty. Not in Ranieri's time and certainly no need in Mourinho's time. You should probably be more objective because MU was a thousand times more dirty than any other teams I know, in the past. Your comment that Chelsea will never win any games fairly without playing dirty are just so childish and typical of a jealous fanatic when Chelsea used to beat MU so many times before this. :) Chelsea have always win their games fairly. I can also said that MU sucks like no other and played sh!t football (especially against AC Milan) in the last Champions League. So, open your eyes....
2007-09-24 13:12:51 · answer #2 · answered by Skystryfe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea were not playing better than Utd at any time during the game. You say the coach should have reacted immediately when Utd scored. In what way? I cannot recall Chelsea having a worthwhile shot at goal. They deserved the red card and Joe Cole was lucky to stay on the pitch after his tackle on Cristiano. There was no way he was going to win the ball. I do sympathise over the penalty however since it was a blatant dive by Saha and I would have sent him off.
2007-09-25 07:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by david c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rubbish - Utd were playing far better than Chelsea before the dubious red card. I'm not biased here being neither a Utd or a Chelsea fan, but I am a football fan and this question is just rewriting a game where Chelsea played poorly!
2007-09-24 07:43:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets clear some points up:
1: First penalty should have been given against Joe Cole.
2: Mikel should NOT have been sent off
3: Tevez's winner was a minute OVER stoppage time allowance.
4: Joe Cole should have been sent off
5: Rooney should have been sent off
6: Saha dived, slightest touch and it looked like he was shot with a sniper. Cheat!!
7: Man U deserved win.
8: Chelsea rely on Drogba and Lampard (Lets be honest who wouldn't miss them)
9: Mourinho wouldn't have done any better with squad available.
10: Shevchenko + Ballack cost mourinho his job.
11: Terry + Rooney haven't played well for 6 months.
12: Any man u fan who ridicules chelsea's spending just take note: YOU HAVE SPENT OVER £30 MILLION ON NANI (A poor mans ronaldo) and ANDERSON (So so bad)
2007-09-24 04:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
i argee with you chelsea played much better football than man utd before the sending off John Obi Mikel finally Andriy Shevchenko got a run he played alright and also the refs were on man utd side so it was like chelsea having 11 man and man utd having an extra 12th man on the field
2007-09-24 05:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chelsea didn't play better than Man Utd at all!!
Chelsea probably played the best they could, which was sht and just not good enough!I'm a Man Utd supporter, and I do think that the red card situation was a bit hasty but Chelsea are dirty players!Man Utd played much better than them and deserved to win, and whether he got red carded or not, we would have won.Chelsea are not a good football team, without playing dirty they will never win any games fairly, and I think it's just gonna go downhill for them from now.
Man Utd played better and it showed, they won
2-0!!Good ol' United thrashed 'em! :D
2007-09-24 03:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
You are completely right but that is common in football, if a team win every one is hero. Otherwise (defeating) only the coach is the cause.
2007-09-24 03:44:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How are Chelski going to buy themselves out of this one hahaha hahahahahaha, I'm not a Man U supporter I hate them, glad they won though, money can't buy you everything.
Chelsea can now get back to the middle of the table where they belong.
EDIT What do you mean these birds, cheeky bugger haha. I love football and yes I do know the offside rule.
Drogba the diver, Lampard the limpit hahahahaha, bet they're all crying into their Earl Grey Tea
2007-09-24 03:39:37 · answer #9 · answered by samicles 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Aren't you forgetting that the game after a manager goes and a new one is appointed is usually the best the team give the new manager?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-09-24 04:10:54 · answer #10 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha! Chelsea never played better than Manu....You can't blame it on the Chelsea's manager just because their player suck.....
2007-09-24 04:50:49 · answer #11 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋