at those who "change their stories",
has it occurred to you all that the McCanns & their friends (including, or rather especially, the Tanners) may have been instructed by investigating officials to plant red herrings as an attempt to outwit the abductor???
The media, unwittingly laps up all data as scoops with no thought to the truth or context behind, resulting in the unsuspecting public being fed...um...red herrings for breakfast, lunch & dinner...
That explains why it is only NOW that we hear that Gerry McCann believed the abductor was hiding in the room when he went to check on his Madeleine. Surely, if he had proclaimed from day 2 that he believed that the abductor was in the room it would have
given the abductor insights to the investigation. BTW, that the evil scum hasn't been yet nailed yet should NOT discredit the investigating methods used at that time.
It also explains why Jane Tanner kept changing her story.
Apart from the shock, disbelief, confusion, grieft & utter lack of knowledge as to how to react in such a situation, which are the reasons normally why witnesses make lots of inconsistent observations, i do believe that planting red herrings as an attempt to hide info privvy to the investigation explains a lot of the inconsistencies...that have been misinterpretated as indications of the McCanns/ their friends' guilt.
2007-09-23 20:18:42 · 4 answers · asked by Faith 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If that were the case I would say it would be a really odd way to investigate a kidnapping. Honestly, faith I think it is them grasping at straws. And as far as Jane Tanners story..Isn't she the one that left her sick child alone while she went out? I personally think leaving a sick child behind is even more so neglectful then leaving kids that are to young. Most decent parents would not even leave their sick child with a sitter. And also as far as she goes, a possibly innocent man has had his life turned upside down because of what she saw months after Madeleines dissapearence.
2007-09-23 23:27:56 · answer #1 · answered by Ladybugs77 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably the only consistent evidence to date is a lack of any evidence
2007-09-23 21:04:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Seeing as the only evidence so far, is slightly damaging to the McCanns. I think that you are the only one here with a problem.
2007-09-23 20:27:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Faith, you waste your breath on those who dont want to hear.
Their minds are closed.
2007-09-23 20:25:15 · answer #4 · answered by ditto 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋