....for democrats if things are looking good in Iraq in 6~9 months?
2007-09-23 20:13:21 · 13 answers · asked by America_Akbar 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
-
letfreedomring - you must come from the planet DaisyFeather.
-
2007-09-23 20:39:19 · update #1
Uber bad. Not to mention the outrage Americans feel towards the lack of outrage the Dems Presidental Candidates have shown towards Moveon. Support our troops? Only if Uncle Soros says so. Now, things are getting interesting. The Dems, especially Hillary and her Hsu situation, are in the frying pan. And I'm loving every minute of it.
2007-09-23 20:37:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
How the hell could things in Iraq 'look good' in any fashion? How could any outcome at this point have been worth a trillion dollars, 4,000 dead, the loss of American reputation and prestige worldwide, the sinking of the US dollar relative to other currencies, etc.? It's an idiotic concept. Turning all of Iraq into a garden shouldn't have cost that much.
More importantly, when the hell do you pro-war people plan to pay back the trillion dollars you extorted from your own children to pay for this mess? Oh, that's right - you don't. Real responsible of you. Dumping debt all over your children through irresponsible spending - real 'conservative' of you.
2007-09-24 04:18:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
And if it is we will still have an incompetent government, a failing economy, 9 trillion in debt and AQ still stronger than they were 6 years ago. Dems do not like any of this - but we are capable of recognizing it. So are the American people which is why you guys are looking at the pantskicking of all time in 2008.
Don't get me wrong - I am absolutely thrilled that you guys are so determined not to learn anything from the humiliation of the 2006 elections. I am just curious as to why you are so determined to make 2008 so much easier?
2007-09-24 03:19:24 · answer #3 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Dems don't sweat successful military objectives in Iraq. We're helping the people and meeting Geneva Conference requirements---great!!
Dems just think that $50 billion a month pricetag for Iraq war can best be spent on things needing fixing here in America.
2007-09-24 03:18:19 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Wizard 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It won't. In the area outside of Camp Taji, the Iraqi guards who man the checkpoints don't even have their weapons handy. Seems that in an area where attack by an insurgent could occur at any time, you'd want your weapon handy unless you were certain there was nothing to be concerned about. The only way you could be certain is if you were part of the insurgency.
2007-09-24 03:21:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I suppose it will look good if they want it to.
They broadcast the reports given to them on the news.
If they say the war is looking good then you know it must be true.
They are politicians why would they lie?
Where I come from every Americans life is valuable and no war is ever good or looking good.
2007-09-24 03:24:43 · answer #6 · answered by letfreedomring 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How can it look good? We invaded a sovereign state without a legitimate reason. Consequently, the current administration has squandered $3.8 trillion in future generations' national treasure. No connection to Osama bin Laden, No involvement in 911, No WMD. We assumed responsibility for rebuilding a country that we shouldn't have destroyed in the first place. How many more trillions will it cost? Therefore, how can it look good?
Maybe we should also increase Chalabi's allowance?! What do you think?
2007-09-24 03:37:29 · answer #7 · answered by James S 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
let's see....our 105th congress has passed some astonishing bills during their term. 9 renamed post offices, a whopping $.70 minimum wage increase and 171 congressional investigations for violations they say happened as far back as 2000. America has really made some significant strides in progress with the 105th congress at the helm. With these monumental successes alone it should guarantee them a total success. LOL LOL LOL
2007-09-24 03:23:52 · answer #8 · answered by citizenvnfla 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
probably pretty bad.
what's your point?
why have you turned politics into a football game?
what's best for the country is what matters. people's lives are at stake, not just how well your team does.
2007-09-24 03:37:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
nevermind about our soldiers, or what is RIGHT.
how will something hurt the dems.
amazing.
america - are you seeing this transparant rubbish?
2007-09-24 12:23:27 · answer #10 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋