It only emphasizes the fact that Hillary has her own agenda, and it is NOT for the good of the country. She had her shot at the presidency while Bill was her puppet, and found out really quickly, the American public will not tolerate her form of politics.
If she has her way, Washington DC will be renamed New Moscow!
2007-09-23 20:11:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Edward B 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
I suspect it is true, each of the few times that she has visited the troops she has been booed, so it is not a big step to think a lot of troops would be upset at her over General Petraeus being called that.
I guess the nick name is pretty good from the Dem's side of the house, they expected him to come to congress and tell what they wanted to hear but instead they got an ear full of the truth.
I have a lot of respect for the man, he sat there in front of congress basically being told he was a liar and incompetent and maintained his rational demeanor and stuck with the truth.
2007-09-24 03:09:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
While I strongly disagree with the anti-victory crowd. I am not in a rage over this act. I frankly expected it. She voted for military action she did not support, and even voted against forcing an attempt at a diplomatic resolution. She claims that the war is lost (or unwinnable, I forget which) and also claims to support the troops, but keeps voting to keep us fighting.
2007-09-24 03:09:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
OMG. Did you know the American troops in Iraq aren't anywhere near as collectively against Bush and what the U.S. is doing over there than the people who post and answer on Yahoo Answers????
2007-09-24 03:03:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes. Misleading stories such as the moveon.org General Petraeus one offends most rational people who don't have an extreme political agenda and politicans who embrace that message do so at the peril of their political career.
2007-09-24 03:06:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why wouldn't they be? She's in Soros's pocket and claims to support the troops while letting "Uncle Soros" slam them and their leader. Rage doesn't begin to describe what they must feel.
2007-09-24 03:03:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well, I do know that is a lie and it is not the first lie that Rep. King has spoken about what is happening in Iraq.
2007-09-24 06:57:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Peter Pumpkin Eater 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Half of those I've talked to agree with Movon.org. When a general allows himself to be used for political purposes then he must expect to get some mud slung on him.
2007-09-24 04:03:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by austin j 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Newsmax is biased right wing news source. I beleive nothing that is on that site
2007-09-24 04:25:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by xg6 7
·
1⤊
2⤋