but then, three days later, abdul-sattar abu risha, leader of the "anbar awakening" (the guy george bush posed with in photo-ops) was assassinated. it became clear than anbar wasn't the bed of roses patreus said it was.
it is now known that the bush administration is actually paying off terrorists in anbar (with our tax dollars) to keep them from attacking us.
is this how a "decider" fights terrorism?
didn't he say he wouldn't negotiate with terrorists?
does this mean bush lied to us?
does this mean general patreus lied to us?
that he betrayed us?
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/62827/
2007-09-23
19:36:22
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
what is a legitimate source? corporate news? official government news?
i'll take this, thanks.
2007-09-23
19:56:56 ·
update #1