Im am well aware of the need of world hunger but do you actually have to be on television and worldly noticed.

Question

to get your point accross or isnt it better just to give. Other wise it is all about you giving and not the story of the ones you help.

Answer 1

I agree with you very much. No need of media milieage if you wanted to help. Why do you have to advertise if you want to help. To show to the whole world that you are very rich and people will look up to you and treat you like a King. It is a shame for what is important is the desire to help other people from starvation. Anyway, god gives indolence to those who have big hearts to the needy. Will this be a part of a grandeur to call the attention of the the world community? World hunger is a an old problem of the United Nations. One could donate huge amount if you want to help or through the International Red Cross or any competent World Organization.

Thanks to the question and have a wonderful day!

Answer 2

Giving only encourages the problem.

In 2003, 25,000 children died each day. Continuing to throw money at the situation only allows it to flourish or fester.

If you cannot afford to feed yourself this month then, now is not the time to be having a child.

The combined stupidity of our species is amazing.

Answer 3

imagine everybody with just an altruistic motive and wanting to give? is that practical? no it is not. its important people get some publicity for their social work. thats called philanthropy. real people in this imprefect world wont do it otherwise.