Was the collapse of the WTC done by controlled demolition??

Question

I have seen very covincing evidence and heard firefighters accounts of bombs going off all over the building, There are even videos showing demolition squibs going off as the towers fell!!! Then when the support beams were uncovered the found them severed at an angle commonly used in demo!!! clean cut steel supports??? makes me ask some questions!! How about molten steel that should not have melted unless a heat source much more powerful that jet fuel!! Thermite and thermate traces were found on the beams. I would love to believe my government but their story doesn't fit at all!!!

I understand that the aircraft did collide with the WTC, being a structural engineer I find it hard to believe those buildings would have fell just from the planes!!! Especially not at freefall speed!! It is not physically possible, if the lower support beams were undamaged they would have slowed the buildings from falling, the 110 storie buildings fell into its basement to create a pile of rubble 30 feet high!!! "The art of controlled demolition, smash a building into a million pieces by pulling out its legs allowing it to freefall into its own basement. spoken by a demo expert about the WTC!!! Too many variable for both of those towers to free fall. It just cant happen that way. wake up people, there should be no need for debunkers. If there is no eveidence. The fact for all the debunking makes me even more suspicious

De-bunked by govt. payed de-bunkers, My uncle is a scientist, physics...he also believes the freefall was impossible without the suppot beams being cut!!

bullfrog, excellent point, I work with demolition experts all the time!! For building that large to be brough down that cleanly, the preperation for a job that big would take weeks if not months!cooincidentally sections of both building were shut down for "maitenence" in the weeks prior to 9/11. The buildings were far too large to rush a demo operation! You mean to tell me they dropped em perfectly after rushing the demo in 6 hours!!!???IMPOSSIBLE, Even if what you say is true it still is a conspiricy because of the fact that they never admiited to pulling the plug on any building, if they did it in secret that is the definition of conspiricy!!!

Anyone whoe called me a quack, must not have a mind of their own!!! The WTC was demolished, do the research fro yourselves people if you dont believe it!! Our government is evil and they needed an event to jumpstart their NWO a fascist police state we all are living in...dont TAZE me bro for my ideas!!! Research, and connect the dots for yourself, dont just blindly believe what is on the hypnobox(TV). Life is far more complicated than those with IQs less than 100 can ever believe. I am a structural engineer and those buildings didn't come down in free fall on their own. so before you call the many many people who know the truth wackos. It might be wise to have some real info, something not off fox news SCHMUCKS!!

Answer 1

I believe that you are correct to be skeptical about the official report that has been the building blocks for most media stories on 9/11. The inconsistencies, omissions, and outright lies in the 9/11 Commission report have lead many bright people throughout the world to question the official account of the 9/11 events. These people are not quacks and they do not have extreme political views on the whole. Demonstrations in Seattle and other parts of the country with people holding signs saying "9/11 was an inside job" has not been covered much. The media failed to cover the plea of victim families for a new investigation.

Professor Steven Jones of BYU described in a paper how unlikely the pancake theory was. Unfortunately, the media is not listening to him and even PBS aired a simulation that violated the laws of physics. His clear analysis has not been refuted. His statement was that the 9/11 building collapses were most likely a planned demolition. He was open to other theories, but none of the others match the facts. Why was nearly all of the steel removed illegally from the crime scene before we could have objective analysis done?

It seems most likely to me that WTC1, WTC2, and WTC3 were demolished and that Osama is the least likely culprit of the crime. We need to get to the bottom of this. We should listen to the observations of firemen who heard multiple timed explosions. Forgetting about politics, the physics point to a planned demolition. How does the commision explain: Squibs, collapse near speed of gravity, and the energy required to pulverize concrete and contents?

Answer 2

Yes, but it wasn't a conspiracy. If you noticed the pictures of the first tower hit the top of the tower canted over at a dangerous angle. It looked as if it might fall sideways. Consider what the loss of life might have been if the towers had not collapsed straight down but had fallen sideways instead.

In densely populated areas most tall buildings are prepared so they can be pulled (a euphemism for demolished in a controlled way) to prevent a more catastrophic incident should the building be damaged by natural forces. No one predicted a purposeful plane crash with a plane full of fuel although they had considered an accidental crash and had designed the buildings to withstand such an incident. As it became apparent that the first tower might fall over or drop a lot of debris (big chunks) over a wide area of Manhattan one of the most densely populated parts of the world the decision had to be made to pull the buildings. Arguably the decision might have been delayed longer but the potential for a more extreme catastrophe loomed in the minds of those responsible. A decision that is kin to the decision generals make in war.

Answer 3

Hmm... that might be nice if you lived in a box.... but the fact that the whole world saw 2 planes flying into the towers pretty much clears up any lame conspiracy theories.
Now, if you want to talk about the fact that government officials knew it was going to happen, then maybe you have an argument.

Answer 4

No, it wasn't. It's a conspiracy theory spawned from American dogma and fear. We're such an elitist nation that it frightens many citizens to think of our country as vulnerable to atrocities as prodigious as 9/11.

If you look at the science, the myriad of private and government reports, and watch the footage that isn't subtitled or narrated by sources from either side, you'll see that it's not a demolition, but a collapse.

Answer 5

The government's explanation is a cover-up, false, and filled with erroneous information and assumptions.

The collapse was caused by demolitions inside the building. You can't un-hear multiple explosions the firemen heard throughout the building. They were the witnesses - they heard it.

Answer 6

I believe the jets were piloted all the way to the ground, so yes. I would love to disbelieve my government but the evidence is just too strong to do so.

Answer 7

Yes it was. You are right. Thank God the truth is out. Maybe we will never see this question again. Although seeing this question 6000 times already is not that much.

Answer 8

You can't be serious? can you? come on now, you must be one of a few in this entire country that believe in that.

Answer 9

Controlled demolition!!! Don't be ridiculous.

Answer 10

Luke 21.27-28
Luke 21.34-36
Leviticus 26.30
Leviticus 26.27-28
What do you think?