John Randolph and Thomas Jefferson and then By the first quarter of the 19th Century, J.Q. Adams and Andrew Jackson.........
2007-09-23 17:25:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by firechick1721 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I got a couple of names from (anti-Federalist Samuel Bryan, Federalist James Wilson) from the site: http://www.americanrevolution.com/ConstitutionalConvention.htm
Below is an exerpt. Some other names are mentioned elsewhere on the website:
The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists
Because of its size, wealth, and influence and because it was the first state to call a ratifying convention, Pennsylvania was the focus of national attention. The positions of the Federalists, those who supported the Constitution, and the anti-Federalists, those who opposed it, were printed and reprinted by scores of newspapers across the country. And passions in the state were most warm. When the Federalist-dominated Pennsylvania assembly lacked a quorum on September 29 to call a state ratifying convention, a Philadelphia mob, in order to provide the necessary numbers, dragged two anti-Federalist members from their lodgings through the streets to the State House where the bedraggled representatives were forced to stay while the assembly voted. It was a curious example of participatory democracy.
On October 5 anti-Federalist Samuel Bryan published the first of his "Centinel" essays in Philadelphia's Independent Gazetteer. Republished in newspapers in various states, the essays assailed the sweeping power of the central government, the usurpation of state sovereignty, and the absence of a bill of rights guaranteeing individual liberties such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. "The United States are to be melted down," Bryan declared, into a despotic empire dominated by "well-born" aristocrats. Bryan was echoing the fear of many anti-Federalists that the new government would become one controlled by the wealthy established families and the culturally refined. The common working people, Bryan believed, were in danger of being subjugated to the will of an all-powerful authority remote and inaccessible to the people. It was this kind of authority, he believed, that Americans had fought a war against only a few years earlier.
The next day James Wilson, delivering a stirring defense of the Constitution to a large crowd gathered in the yard of the State House, praised the new government as the best "which has ever been offered to the world." The Scotsman's view prevailed. Led by Wilson, Federalists dominated in the Pennsylvania convention, carrying the vote on December 12 by a healthy 46 to 23.
2007-09-24 00:27:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kris 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson lead the Democrat-Republicans, aka Anti-Federalists.
The Federalists wanted a strong central government and weak states, while the Democrat-Republicans wanted strong states and a weak Federal government.
Now days, both the Democrats (who are the lineal but not philisophical descendants of the Jeffersonian-Jacksonian Democrat-Republicans) and the Republicans (officially the Grand Old Party) both want a huge Federal government with weak subservient states.
Doc
2007-09-24 00:24:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Doc Hudson 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Federalists= Alexander Hamilton
Anti-federalists= Thomas Jefferson
All really started developing into parties because of the National Bank bill and arguements between Hamilton and Jefferson
2007-09-24 00:22:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeff 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are like the democatic and republicans, it was two people from the independents thing, you know whith all the names!???
2007-09-24 00:18:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋