Does anyone have legitimate evidence that CNN is presenting misleading information in this story?

Question

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/23/iran.us/index.html
Or is there any legitimate reason to question the credibility of Zbigniew Brzezinski? Or should comments from such people receive heavier consideration if they don't appear to have as much of a vested interest in their (or their party's) reelection?

Brzezinski on Ahmadinejad speaking at Columbia:

"Look, if his views are odious, we can say so, but we have a society of openness," he said. "If we start censoring in advance what it is we like to hear and what we don't hear, we're on a slippery slope."

Answer 1

no

Answer 2

You are forgetting Iran is a terrorist state.
You don't advance terrorist's states. That is like advancing Nazi Germany.
And You are forgetting Columbia is not "open". In fact it refuses several pro US speakers presence at it campus.

This called bait and switch

Columbia is closed unless you are pushing a socialist anti American agenda
If England gets nukes GREAT. The US is not against advancement.



CNN is misleading by only reporting half the story.

Answer 3

cnn puts a leftist slant on every thing.