English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

as a country, shouldnt they have protection?
If someone bombed mexico and canada, wouldnt we want something to protect us also?

2007-09-23 16:53:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

First -- there is no evidence that Iran has nuclear weapons -- or that they are attempting to create them -- all we have is speculation, and their refusal to allow foreigners into their high-security labs (just like we don't).

But even if they did choose to develop nuclear weapons -- as most of a dozen other countries have also done -- as long as they don't use them, they are no worse than any other country that has them -- certainly no worse than North Korea, who was also considered just as "evil".

And as deterrents go -- that was our excuse in the 50s and 60s -- and Englands's excuse in the 60s and 70s -- and Indai and Pakistan's excuse in the 90s -- and Israel's excuse for however long they've had them.

2007-09-23 17:02:08 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 2

I think America should go to war with iran based on this information. I mean how could it be wrong? Going off past intelligence of 9/11, iraq, there 0 for 2 so far. 3rd times a charm.

Wise up people. In the age of peak oil, maintaining energy reserves is a national interest. Russia and China are both involved heavily in supplying arms to Iran (not that they know how to use them) as a means to ensure access to there oil fields which produce 4 million barrels a day. Whether you believe the current administration after Iraq is up to you but by invading another country without provacation the US will most likely face a response from russia and china and the wider community (not that this administration cares).

2007-09-23 17:30:45 · answer #2 · answered by spanghead 1 · 0 0

the problem with that kind of protection is that it goes against the world's sanctioned treaty on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons...and that's just the legal aspect of it!

add that the rogue state of the Iranian government, a terrorist sponsoring state, with no Freedom, no Democracy, is a Muslim extremist totalitarianism, and you have the making of a fascist regime with nukes...! kind of a nazi germany with nukes!!

do you understand the problem now?

it is NOT us who is the danger, BUT Iran and its lunnny regime! and that's the problem!

...not to mention they are providing the sofisticaded weapons been used to kiil our guys in Iraq...they are killing our guys right now in Iraq!

as for is Iran making nukes or not ANYONE that knows even a little bit of what is going on can see they want nukes!

the only reason to enrich Uranium up to +90% grade is to make weapons, power plants and reactors in general use a lower grade Uranium, simply becuase the higher grade would melt the cores.... so them wanting high yield is on for one thing..the bomb! they even turned down offers by Russia to give them a low yield reactor:

http://www.iranpressnews.com/english/source/008709.html

so again if they want high yield...well... there is only one use for that....BBBOOOOOMMMMMMMmmmm......!!! the bomb!

2007-09-23 17:07:19 · answer #3 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 0 0

i understand what you attempt to assert. The United international locations is attempting to administration international locations with Violent revenge pushed ideals. undergo in recommendations while Iran took over the yank Embassy and held all those human beings in lock up for over a twelve months? Then skipped over the Geneva conventions that Embassies are to no longer be touched. they do no longer honor the Geneva Conventions, they won't be relied on. think of what they might do with a nuke if that they had one. they are not to blame associates. in the event that they might help combat terrorism, they might get on someones sturdy record.

2016-10-05 06:26:59 · answer #4 · answered by courcelle 4 · 0 0

You numbnuts just can't seem to get it through your abnormally thick skulls that once Iran goes nuclear, they will be incinerated from the Israeli pre-emptive first strike.

2007-09-23 17:05:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

And we're going to bomb the crap out of them if they don't wise up.

A nuclear armed Iran is unacceptable.

2007-09-23 17:00:30 · answer #6 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0 2

it's good for iran if iran has nuclear weapons. it's not good for anybody else.

2007-09-23 17:02:37 · answer #7 · answered by White 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers