mel gibson made a few comments about the jews and liberals demand his head. don imus made an off color remark on the radio and he has been hogtied and whipped by the liberal media since. micheal richards made an angry slur at black hecklers and liberals freak out. trent lott made a birthday toast to strom thurmond and liberals demand his firing. and john rocker made a few nasty remarks about immigrants and he got booed at every game he played.
yet kathy griffin made a nasty offensive hateful remark at christians and liberals say she's "she's exercising her freedom of speech" .
i don't want to get into a religious debate with this question, i'm just asking. doesn't this prove that liberals are total hypocrites when it comes to free speech? if you condemn hate speech from one side but excuse the other, you are being a hypocrite.
why weren't the above mentioned "exercising their freedom fo speech"?
2007-09-23 16:47:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Liberals are actually very, very closed minded. They don't want anyone to think whatever they want, they want everyone to think exactly like they do.
Liberals are only happy when there is something to complain about. And if there isn't anything, they will make something up or distort the facts to fit their agenda.
2007-09-23 17:15:26 · answer #1 · answered by Jax Cop 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The Liberal ideology is a theory which holds forth beliefs that have no basis in reality.
They are Advocates of a policy that empowers a strong government to enslave its people with a high tax burden incident to the support of extravagant and unnecessary social programs destructive to both the work ethic among the lower class, and the incentive to innovate and succeed among the working class.
The problems we face today are because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.
A democracy will continue to exist up until
the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous
gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority
always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from
the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally
collapse over loose fiscal policy
2014-12-21 05:21:20 · answer #2 · answered by Arnie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when has a comedian's offensive remarks automatically become a "liberal" issue? I'm not Christian nor am I particularly religious but I think her comments were in poor taste. However, she does have freedom of speech, just like Michael Richards did. What he did wrong, however, was try to deny it. I think it is so sad that the term "liberal" has been made a catchprase by many as a way to demonize everything they think is wrong in this coutnry. If something is wrong, bad, evil, or just plain immoral, it's "liberal". If it's right, good, or patriotic, then it's "conservative". I also think that most people who use that term as their personal catchprase actually have no clue as to what it really means. It's just a word that sounds good to them to criticize something they don't like. I have to admit that I think you're also guilty of doing that in your commentary.
2007-09-23 18:53:25 · answer #3 · answered by RoVale 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The ends justifies the means.
2007-09-23 19:26:48 · answer #4 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's the media's fault for spinning everything. Look at the "Jena 6" situation.
2007-09-23 17:13:40 · answer #5 · answered by sweetmommy 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why are conservatives a mob of thickheads?
2007-09-23 22:07:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it was a Joke, get over it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-09-24 17:31:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋