should lawful abortion be limited to cases where the pregnant woman's life is threatened by the pregnancy?

Question

why should it not be allow, but with certain circumstances

Answer 1

i have no problem with the morning after pill , i have no problem with 1st trimester abortion, either, 3rd trimester i have a problem with 2nd is up for grab because we are making viable fetuses live out of the womb with very minor problems every day

BUT it is not my choice, i don't want federal government having anything to do with regulating it , if it was up to me i don't know depends on the law trying to be passed at the state level to how i vote. but i would like a vote at each state as to what each state would do

Answer 2

there is one major problem with this idea, I am sure you are too young to remember back alley abortions, where woman died from the procedures. Although I do not believe there are many medical reasons the mother would be endangered enough to require an abortion, this would be one good reason to consider one, but it should also be legal, but not covered by tax dollars, or allowed for a minor without consent from a parent or guardian, and then only during the first trimester. Late term abortions, is basically killing an infant that would otherwise have the chance to survive. the only other reason would be if the baby has no chance for life outside of the womb (will be born without vital organs, etc.)

Answer 3

For physical or mental health reasons, I do not disapprove. I certainly don't agree with abortion being used for birth control. That said, abortion is between a woman, an involved father, and her Dr. However, I could not take a life in that way unless there was proof of the fetus being gravely compromised, or it was the result of rape or incest. Sadly, an abortion is more desirable than giving birth and letting the baby die, which happens all to often. And in my opinion, late term abortions of a healthy fetus are murder. Still I say: "Judge that you be not judged."

Answer 4

Any answer to your question would involve personal morals. Rather than attempt to invoke my morals on you, I would rather you consider a couple of questions:

1. Most of the anti-abortion arguments I've heard are from people who are also pro death penalty. Also the opposite - the pro-choicers are anti-death penalty. So let me get this straight - It's OK to kill some people but not others?

2. Abortion is very much a question of morals - as is killing in general. Does the government have a right to legislate our individual morals? If so, does the government have the right to decide which morals are worthy of legislation and which are not?

Now, to answer and expand upon your question, all abortions are legal in this country (USA) by edict of the Supreme Court in Roe vs. Wade (1972). Since when did the Constitution invoke legislative powers upon the Supreme Court?

I know my answer hasn't been much help, but I would ask you to do one thing: In questions like this, as they involve your personal life, make your own decision based on what you think is right. Don't be influenced by others.

Answer 5

I think a woman should have the choice for 6-7 months after that the fetus is capable of surviving outside womb. After that time abortions should only be allowed to protect the mother's health or if something is seriously wrong with fetus

Answer 6

he's the war God of the classic Hebrews. They mandatory a God that became so undesirable and undesirable that the remainder of their international could in basic terms run in terror from them. It exceptionally lots worked. they had to combat the people already residing of their promised land, its irritating that God gave them assets already occupied. The Hebrews did no longer have lots reverence for the fetus. there became a ceremony the priest finished if a guy felt the baby his spouse became donning wasn't his. It in touch eating one among those combination that could harm the unborn fetus. If the baby survived it belonged to the husband if she miscarried then it meant she were untrue, and the little possible die, and her too . historic Hebrews felt somewhat one gained its soul on the 1st breath, simply by fact Adam became no longer alive till God breathed into him. nonetheless others felt it exceeded off whilst the girl became first waiting to sense the fetus pass. beginning administration and abortions weren't uncommon in historic circumstances.

Answer 7

Abortion is legal because the Supreme Court ruled that the government has no right dictating to people what they will do with thier own bodies.
When conservatives decide to accept that individual rights do not mean less than religous dogma in this country they will start to understand this.
But until then we will still get attempts to limit it (better than attempts to outlaw it altogether I'll admit).

Answer 8

hell no. the government has no place deciding whether or not a woman should be allowed to have an abortion.

Answer 9

Yes, both of my grandchildren were aborted and I have never gotten over it. I have cried for 15 years to think of all the love I missed sharing wonderful memories with them. They deserved better treatment than being flushed down a toilet.

Abortion shouldn't be allowed except in emergency situations because it's murder pure and simple.

Answer 10

It is VERY RARE a pregnancy will endanger a woman's life these days!

That is a red herring.