English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

yes, i believe in vampires and werewolves, and witches.
no, i do not believe in frankenstien, dracula, or sabrina the teenage witch.

i want to see how many people can try to convince me that vampires are real.
yes, maybe this is a waste of 5 points for me, i have seen many people say that, but you shouldn't be complaining, you can get two points for just answering.

2007-09-23 14:51:19 · 31 answers · asked by Bella Swan [[marrying Edward!]] 3 in Society & Culture Mythology & Folklore

31 answers

why would we try to convince you that vampires are real when you just wrote you already believe in them?

2007-09-23 14:55:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Well considering that vampires are in every culture, that if it was a coincidence then well, some story tellers were just running out of ideas... But no i don't think it was. As well as the old legends all are basically the same, The Chinese said leave a mirror near your door (a polished piece of metal back then) to distract them and keep them from getting to you before the sun rose, the Europeans said throw seeds over the afflicted graves, and they will spend the entire night just counting seeds.
If these two separate cultures believed in these things, and had similar ways to stop them then who's to say they don't exist.

Now on the other hand there are those who consider themselves Psi vampires. Or psychic vamps. They are humans just like us who need to feed off of other peoples energy.

http://templeuvup.ning.com/

2007-09-23 15:23:41 · answer #2 · answered by Mana 2 · 0 1

you're making a classic argument utilized by ability of many agnostics. nonetheless the inspiration of your argument is logical, this particular utility of that's, in my view, incorrect. people, a minimum of the people you're concerning, have the worry-free perception that the international may be defined by using a sequence of organic regulations. We form the universe and make predictions of what can and can't ensue in line with our form. If something surprising happens, we could desire to refine our form to replicate the universe greater accurately. We call this technique technology. In our modern form of ways issues paintings, there is not any device of regulations that permit for the existence of Vampires, Mermaids, Centaur or one among those different mythical creatures. incredibly much less unique creatures like Unicorns, Dragons, Thunderbirds, Bigfoot etc. do have room in our modern form for probably having existed faster or later, nonetheless probably extinct now and easily no longer how maximum myths describe them. finally, we *do no longer* recognize precisely how the international works - there is scientists everywhere in the globe attempting to be sure in basic terms that. yet in accordance to our modern form, vampires do no longer exist. till something amazing happens to make us exchange our form, they are going to stay excluded as a hazard.

2016-10-09 17:44:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Your question is wrong on 1 level:

Burden Of Proof:

the claim that whatever has not yet been proved false must be true (or vice versa). Essentially the arguer claims that he should win by default if his opponent can't make a strong enough case.

There may be three problems here. First, the arguer claims priority, but can he back up that claim? Second, he is impatient with ambiguity, and wants a final answer right away. And third, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

2007-09-23 15:16:33 · answer #4 · answered by James M 3 · 3 1

I think you're going about it all wrong. Isn't it your duty to prove that they are real since maybe no one has actually seen a werewolf before?

It's like telling me to prove that Bigfoot or space aliens are not real. The easiest thing for me would be to say that there has never been physical evidence to prove otherwise.

The only way to make someone believe is to show them friend. Otherwise you argument holds no water.

2007-09-23 14:59:52 · answer #5 · answered by gh0st 3 · 2 0

May I ask just how many vampires, werewolves and "witches" you've spoken to recently? I won't try to convince you that they're real, because they aren't. You've been watching too many Bela Lugosa and Vincent Prince movies. Sorry. Also sorry, too lazy to run spell check.

2007-09-25 20:26:39 · answer #6 · answered by mhiaa 7 · 0 0

They're some closely related things to Vampires.
such as Queen Elizabeth back in the 16th century.
she bathed in blood, beleiving that it made her skin younger and rejuvanted.
she killed arounf 800 sum girls.

The Werewolf didnt eat or kill anybody, but,
there is a story about JoJo the 'dog face boy'
JO-JO The 'Dog Face Boy'

Jo-Jo was born Fedor Jeftichew in Russia in 1868. Until he was brought to London in 1884 by Charles Reynolds, and was exhibited alongside of his father with the same condition, throughout the sideshows and circuses of Europe.
Jo-Jo's father, labeled as "l'homme-chien" (man-dog) also suffered from hypertrichosis, or excessive hairiness, and as this physiological condition is indeed genetic, he passed his uniqueness onto his son. However, the family resemblance seems to have ended there for their hair types differed. No known information was ever discovered about Jo-Jo's mother.
"L'homme-Chien" was one of the most famous human oddities that Europe had ever seen.
Wrongfully accused of 'being raised by wolves,' Jo-Jo's story became known and those whom spread such a rooumer had to give it up and the truth be known.


Then Witches.
there is such a thing, Wiccans are Witches.
Wicca is a religion that practices witchcraft. they do not worship satan, they are not evil, and they do not hurt people. its just their religion!

2007-09-23 15:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by undercoveragent 1 · 2 1

Tell me something.... how many people do you see dead with bite marks in there neck or arm... yeah, but say they got rid of the body... no, it wouldn't work, in today's world we keep track of people much too closely, people would start to suspect something, and even more than that there are to many vampire freaks out there, we would know if they existed, there would be no escape...

2007-09-24 12:08:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We aren't the ones who have to prove anything.

I offer a test to anyone who thinks they're a vampire, I stand with my back to a wall and the "vampire" stands 10 feet infront of me. i hold a $10,000.00 check in my left hand and a 45 caliber pistol in my right. If they get the check, they're a vampire.

NO ONE HAS EVER TAKEN ME UP ON MY OFFER.

VanHelsing kicks ***!

2007-09-23 17:37:09 · answer #9 · answered by The Forgotten 6 · 0 0

Well,not the kind of vampires that suck blood,because there are no proof that people have that happen,unless,I guess they are a part of the population that just disappear,and then,become vampires themselves.I don't really believe in vampires,but,I can't prove they don't exist.I think more likely,werewolves exist though.Oh,and there was someone named Dracula,and he was evil,and mean.

2007-09-23 15:16:54 · answer #10 · answered by Life goes on... 6 · 1 2

Well i know they have people who do call themselves vampires but i want you to know they did have a man called Vlad Dracula, he was like the first know vampire.

2007-09-24 14:56:34 · answer #11 · answered by Mrs. Storm 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers