Was some sort of consensus reached? There's no blow back from U.S. media, so can I presume that the conference accepted the holocaust???
2007-09-23 14:28:38 · 4 answers · asked by poolboyg88 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ahmadinejad has stated that he does not disagree with the European historians and scientists, but he wishes the Holocaust to be examined further and has questioned it. I find that unacceptable but it is typical for a Middle Eastern leader (equal or better than US allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, and the UAE)
His main point is that regardless of the Holocaust, why did the Palestinians get relocated? What did they do? That is a separate issue and I am only relating his point.
2007-09-23 14:49:08 · answer #1 · answered by MrPotatoHead 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The result was that a lot of people were outraged by Iran hosting it -- which was the entire point.
Ahmadinejad could care less about the consensus -- the whole point was to push people's buttons and get them emotionally flustered and upset.
2007-09-23 21:34:08 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iranians..
Just want Iraq.
Yes the majority of the conference accepted history.
2007-09-23 21:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They still deny it and they also came to an agreement that its Iran's job to do an actual holocaust.
2007-09-23 21:32:10 · answer #4 · answered by bushroxursox 2 · 3⤊ 5⤋