What right does Condola Rice have to say this?

Question

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/09/19/rice.iran/index.html?iref=newssearch

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice cautioned the U.N. nuclear watchdog group Wednesday not to interfere with international diplomacy over Iran's alleged weapons program.

Answer 1

yes, trunkster, she is relentlessly supportive of her sugar daddy. she is relentlessly boring with that 60's grill. she is just plain sad, similar to you and your rhetoric. she is speaking her piece like the jerry mahoney dummy that she is for the bush administration.
not too long ago, she would have been cooking bisquits on the crawford ranch for the master. but she's moving on up.

Answer 2

because if iran goes nuclear and there is a nuclear war, which there would have to be one, we would have to strike first before their bomb is ready, but just in case we can't because we can't figure out if they have a bomb or not because the UN keeps getting in the way of our finding out if Iran has a nuclear weapon, so because of UN interference we won't know until the iranian bomb is on its way. we will get our bombs back to Iran, but it will be too late to stop their very sophisticated bomb they were able to make in secret because the UN kept getting involved. Then our leaders and the rest of the corporate government will have some place to go and hide, but the iranian people won't so they will bomb us and we will bomb them and since our leaders will be in hiding, our government will still be in power, but since they don't have anywhere to hide their government will be blown to smittherens and our government will win and then there will be a memorial somewhere for all the americans that died and there will be no mention of the iranians that died and then we will be happy ever after, until some other country wants to get a nuclear weapon and then the cycle will start all over again until there will be no more nuclear wars or people either (except of course all those leaders who are in hiding and can conduct the war while they are in hiding. they will be alive and be able to create a new civilization and world peace at last). So I am very optimistic and think Secretary Rice is doing the best job she can, considering all the secrecy coming from the iranians.

Answer 3

She is just reminding the UN that, like in the case of Iraq, Bush&Cheney can "smell" nuclear weapons better then the nuclear scientists.

Answer 4

It is her job as Secretary of State of the sovereign nation of the United States of America to represent our position to the world.

Answer 5

As a spokesperson representing the position of this country, she is obligated to address the positions which best serve this country whether you libs like it or not.

Whether you want to admit it or not, (or maybe you prefer to just keep your head buried in the sand or elsewhere) the role of each society is to perpetuate its own existence.

Right now, again whether you want to believe it or not, the risk of Iran getting nuclear capabilities is fundamentally akin to suicide for millions in this country.

I hope she is relentless - unlike the sniveling libs we have had in the past who caved on every matter of any consequence whatsoever.

Answer 6

She's stating current US policy -- we rely on the UN determinations when we need an excuse to do something -- but we don't tolerate UN interference when it goes against what we want to do anyway.

This is nothing new -- just more straightforward than most.

Answer 7

What do you mean what right does she have? Do you know what her position is and do you have any idea of how this is normally handled? Can you carry on a lengthy debate about this subject?

Answer 8

Basically what I think she is saying is that you do as your told and stay out of or way . The US has to many times told other countries what to do it is time to let the world run it self with out or help or our military .

Answer 9

She has to wait for B$SH to put the words into her mouth.