http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3639881&page=1
Is this a sign that all the anti-war troop withdrawal talk has been political? A way to win votes?
2007-09-23 13:22:56 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hate to ask for the 1 millionth time, what is the Democrats plan?
2007-09-23 13:24:17 · update #1
i think the clue was when harry reid was told by his own party that unilateral surrender was foolhardy. yes its all political and for no reason other than pelosi spin and posturing.
2007-09-23 13:44:43 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sen. Clinton does not know what the situation will be in Iraq when she becomes President. It really isn't fair to expect her to speculate. Her plan is for a careful and organized with drawl of troops, increasing diplomacy, and leaving some troops to carry out precise missions and directives. I like her plan.
2007-09-23 20:37:08 · answer #2 · answered by wisdomforfools 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary never had intentions of troop withdrawal, any more than the far left had of impeaching Bush.
But Henry, isn't campaigning for the presidency a bunch of people making commitments? What other way would be know where they stand
2007-09-23 20:32:30 · answer #3 · answered by time_wounds_all_heelz 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its just that Hillary isn't a democrat. She hates democracy. Ron Paul is our only hope.
2007-09-23 20:43:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unless she has a crystal ball and can see the future it is not a good idea to make commitments.
2007-09-23 20:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋