Here it is, the soon to be ex-husband is in jail for assult and battery and a few other things. The Protective Order states that he is to have no contact with the minor childern and the wife. Now,the childern have been getting letters from him and his parents have been reading them to the childern and has even been reading the one to the wife to the childern. I thought that the Protective order meant that he can't even write to them. Help me out if I am wrong here, but I thought that he isn't tp have any cantact, that even means writing to the childern and the wife.
2007-09-23 13:03:44 · 3 answers · asked by pj28 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
He cannot write directly -- but other people can read his letters for him -- with or without his permission.
It would require an extension of the protective order -- actually, a whole separate injunction -- to stop his parents from reading his letters to their grandkids.
2007-09-23 13:08:22 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
He's technically not having direct contact with them.. sad, but true. Two ways to stop it.. either keep the kids away from Grandma and Grandpa, or go back to court to have a seperate order entered against them, which the judge might actually do since they're helping Jr go around the court order.
2007-09-23 13:33:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get a life, woman! If he is their father, then he should have contact with his children. Your "protective order" is only a piece of paper. It isn't worth beans, if he decides not to obey it by chopping your head off. And, if I were on a jury, I wouldn't blame any man for doing that, if he was deprived of contact with his children, whatever your excuse.
2007-09-23 13:17:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋