2007-09-23 12:43:59 · 14 answers · asked by Truth Erector 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Doubtful. Bush is a whore who was purchased for by corporate America long before he became president. He knows he couldn't bite the hand that fed him so he was doomed to FcK the American people one way or the other.
2007-09-23 12:53:52 · answer #1 · answered by bettercockster7 c 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Seems like he put his core beliefs before the country and thought it more important to protect the Holy Land instead of America
2007-09-23 19:54:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He could have been a good president if he had done two things -- respected the rule of law and the balance (and separation) of powers -- and been willing to admit when he made a mistake, and to change his plans when he got new information.
I don't even think he would have needed to change his core beliefs -- unless the unitary (dictatorial) executive model and a refusal to admit mistakes are part of his core beliefs.
2007-09-23 19:50:46 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think so, but then again, any president could just change his core beliefs and almost magically become a better politician. That's a lot to ask, but it's not a bad idea....
2007-09-23 19:52:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Your question implies Bush isn't a good president. Some of us are not entirely thrilled with everything he's done but are grateful at any rate because it "coulda" been worse (i.e. Gore or Kerry)!
2007-09-23 19:52:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
bush is a good president and has no need to change his core beliefs...compared to clinton he looks like mother teresa...
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-09-23 20:09:01 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if he could get over the notion that he is god and what he says is right. I have never known him to even discuss another avenue to go, if he had already said what he was going to do. He is so arrogant! So the answer is NO NO
2007-09-23 19:53:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No criticism of him from the looney left is valid when they supported and still support the Clintons. Bill Clinton was so much worse than Bush that you leftnut screwballs don't have a leg to stand on to even begin to criticize Bush.
Talk about criminal regimes,the Clinton regime was it.
2007-09-23 19:56:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Naw they got to him long before he was Gov. of Texas.
He won't invest in stem-cell research but has no problem executing retarded prisoners. He is not a "Uniter". He is not the "Decider". He is a War Monger.
2007-09-23 19:52:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I doubt it. He is too stupid to formulate rational and positive core beliefs and we all know now that he continues to act to protect his core beliefs long after they have been proven wrong.
2007-09-23 19:49:46 · answer #10 · answered by obl_alive_and_well 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋