or did it make it worse? did it increase terrorists numbers and their influence? doesn't matter what his intention was, isn't it the result that counts ?
2007-09-23 12:09:09 · 22 answers · asked by macmanf4j 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
worse, increased the total number of terrorists and gave them more ideological ammunition to recruit more.
2007-09-23 12:17:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Reading these answers is as painful as watching Fox News. Most are way off base. Attacking another country for no legitimate reason will incite hatred and terrorism. Which in most all of these cases are revenge. Our crafty CIA and the media which wash our minds and lure us into the realm of BS. Throw some captivating words such as honor, security , democracy and support and you have to follow or be considered unpatriotic.These elites that control everything like war for it is war that brings the best profits. With the use of our kids they can disrupt countries and endanger themselves while the elites have fancy dinners and laugh about the game they have created with our lives. We are slaves it sounds crazy I know but if you do the research and use logic asking yourself why, you will come to reason. We all have been a victim of our medias control.
The entire world is less safe than it was 5 years ago. the only reason we have not been attacked again is because we havent been objecting the war enough. Now that the masses are fed up with the killing of innocent people and our young sons and daughters fighting a war as the invaders it has damaged our integrity as a nation.
The only person that has the ability to make the necessary changes is Ron Paul look into his message it just makes sense. The world see's us as evil ,the "bad guys" when we used to be the good guys.
2007-09-23 12:38:58 · answer #2 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Much less safe. Just like his actions before 9/11 allowed 9/11 to happen. But, then, it was all part of the neocon plan.
2007-09-29 12:30:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It did not, with the aid of sending the national defend away, and our border patrol to Iraq is making us extra weaker and liable to a different attack. i think of we alreay annoyed the international with all of the wear we did. this is why you spot extra anti-Amrican protests in Iraq, South usa, western Europe, center East, some distance East, or perhaps right here in the States. It in basic terms exhibits that the government is ignoring its Constitutional obligations, and screwing its human beings and the international with conceitedness. thank you for the question.
2016-11-06 05:01:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well first off, I think you implied that his intentions were good when invading Iraq, which I definitely disagree with. I think the war in Afghanistan was justified at the time, but the whole Iraq situation totally fired everyone up who already hated us and pushed those who were leaning that way over the edge. It's a damn mess. Hey Cheney predicted it perfectly in 1994. So clearly he (Cheney) knew what he was getting this country into when he argued the case for war...makes me sick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I
2007-09-23 12:22:52 · answer #5 · answered by monkiby 2 · 8⤊ 1⤋
A lot of people like to say that because of Bush there haven't been any more terrorist attacks on the USA. What they don't know is it's actually my magical anti-terrorist tennis shoe I keep in my closet that's kept the terrorists at bay. Don't believe me? Then explain why there haven't been any more terrorist attacks? Check and mate.
2007-09-23 12:28:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
He made the entire world a more dangerous place. There has never been more hostility toward the USA from other countries as there is now, and it seems like every day there's a new country he's threatening with war for no good reason.
2007-09-23 12:16:46 · answer #7 · answered by lafemelle 4 · 10⤊ 3⤋
Yes, Bush has kept the issue of terrorism and its perpetrators at a constant before the public eye, which has had the effect of making many feel unsafe but that feeling is only that - a feeling.
2007-09-23 12:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by wider scope 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Do you leave your front door wide open when you go to bed at night? No...well, our borders have been more wide open than ever since 9/11, law enforcement has been stripped of their power to act on removing these unknowns, and now this country is flooded...literally flooded with millions of illegals. Who are they...who knows. No, the world is not a safer place and this country surely isn't either.
2007-09-23 12:16:26 · answer #9 · answered by GoodJuJu2U 6 · 9⤊ 4⤋
when you look at clinton ignoring wtc one african embassy bombings and the uss cole as well as six separate chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan and the response of wtc two by bush ending the domestic problem the answer is an emphatic yes things are much safer. the problem is out of control liberals dont understand this and we may go back into this type of situation if the pelosi/reid regime is allowed to have their way with unilateral surrender.
2007-09-23 13:14:44 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋