The specs are located at this web address.
www.dolanauctions.com/computer.html
Any other suggestions would be great too
2007-09-23 11:47:14 · 4 answers · asked by haden78 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Desktops
The Address ending is 'computer.html' Yahoo cut the other part of it off.
2007-09-23 11:48:15 · update #1
I tend to build big and buy every 4 or so years. The last computer I had, I bought back in 2003 and it just exploded today. I am most likely going with Vista, I just have to make sure the MMOs I play are compatible. I didn't even think that they might not be.
2007-09-23 12:23:39 · update #2
Eh, well to be quite honest I forgot all about it. However, thats another 400 bucks that I could put in at a later time.
2007-09-23 12:29:08 · update #3
You have 4GB of RAM there, hence you need a 64-bit OS to run it. So, go with Vista 64, pretty easy.
Now I just have to ask, is there any particular reason you are spending so much money on that motherboard, and then putting only one CPU on it. The only benefit that board has its ability to run 2 CPUs, hence you are wasting money buying it and then only putting one CPU, especially when that one CPU is also the same speed as a 6000+, which could be had for half the money.
2007-09-23 12:18:08 · answer #1 · answered by mysticman44 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would say Vista. With Direct X 10 and the crazy super specs you have, Vista will run so fast, and the games! If you want XP Pro, The 4GB and that woun't be as needed unlike Vista but there are more games (currently) that just supports up to XP. So if you can't wait and want to game now with the older games that aren't compatible with Vista yet go XP, otherwise Vista and wait until it is compatible. So... I say Vista for me :D
Oh did I forget to mention that games such as Halo 2 is only Vista... So new games goes Vista!
2007-09-23 12:03:31 · answer #2 · answered by nVerro 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might propose a sixty 4 bit OS in spite of you going XP or Vista. it quite is the only way which you will quite be waiting to apply all 4 gigs of your ram. i for my area like Vista (i've got have been given the 32 bit, yet i don't have 4 gigs of RAM) My thoughts on the Vista vs. XP conflict are that the those that dislike Vista are those that do in basic terms unlike exchange. Vista isn't comparable to XP, so it is going to take in basic terms a splash getting used to, yet i don't sense that this is a bad equipment in any respect. in regards to the claims that Vista is a reminiscence hog. Technically, particular, this is. Vista will take up a solid bite of your RAM, which on the commencing up sounds like a bad setup, yet quite, this is not unavoidably undesirable. this is because of the fact Vista caches lots of the courses you utilize so as that they run quicker. So particular, it takes up extra RAM, whether this is not the baseline RAM for the working equipment, it takes different courses into consideration.
2016-11-06 05:00:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vista hands down. I do not normally advise installing Vista, but Vista supports all the latest games and handles them better than XP. Your system is fast enough that running Vista will not slow it down to a noticeable amount.
2007-09-23 11:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by Mark L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋