Disturbing content
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/11/07/051107ta_talk_collins
http://wonkette.com/politics/plamegate/literary-libby-remembering-scooters-bestiality-book-242724.php
2007-09-23 11:16:19 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I find that his sentence being commuted as most disturbing because he had been tried, convicted and sentenced. His book, although disturbing, did not break the law.
2007-09-23 11:27:49 · answer #1 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Your information is incorrect, as is usual for liberals. Libbey was not pardoned, his sentence was commuted. He was still required to pay a fine and be on probation. The charges were nothing less than a political witch-hunt by the liberals, who cannot get to the President or Cheney. His book's contents are not required reading, If they are disturbing, don't read the book. The only disturbing item is Bush did not pardon Libbey in this whole judicial fiasco.
2007-09-23 18:36:47 · answer #2 · answered by Cecil n 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
1. Libbey was *NOT* pardoned
2. But I suppose that you approve the President of Iran Speaking at Columbia?
2007-09-23 18:40:13 · answer #3 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋