English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If Hilary is elected, why would she have to raise taxes to pay for her health care system?

If she mandates that the universal healthcare system be more efficient, as she said she will do, and she withdrawals all of the troops from Iraq, as she said she would do, why then does she need to raise my taxes? She should have plenty of money in the Billions of dollars she says we are wasting in Iraq.

Further, we all know that when the federal government gets involved, the healthcare system will run flawlessly and efficiently. Right???

2007-09-23 10:42:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

If we would KEEP our USA dollars in USA and stop sending our MILLIONS of USA money to all the foreign aid.......BINGO...we would not have HOMELESS in AMERICA...or WELFARE...or...or...or.....!!!!!

Yep....AMERICA,, is the RIchest, the Free-st land in the whole world, and yet we send our MONEY all around the whole world ...and yet...here we sit and watch our OWN PEOPLE STARVING to death!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

it makes me sick!
what makes me even sicker ?
our celebrities are out there PROMOTING it! I really dont think they have a clue!!!!!!!! I love our celebrities and think they have done some great stuff, but they need to use their millions RIGHT HERE IN AMERICA FIRST!!!!!!!!!

2007-09-23 11:38:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Even if we withdrawal out of Iraq, all that money that money that we think we will be saving will be going into other programs. We are seriously in red now because of the war and we will still be in the red when we get out just not by much. That is why health care taxes need to be raised.

And as far as the bill that Bush vetoed that would have done something for children''s health care, I think Bush talks a bunch of crap too. Instead of bashing Hillary, let's find out what the Republicans are going do because they haven't offered any solutions yet. They can't because they will only say what has been the conservative line on health care for years and years. In other words, they will not say anything new.

2007-09-23 10:58:18 · answer #2 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0 0

Raising taxes is only a small part of her plan and she'll only raise them on 'corporations', which is nothing but a group of people and 'the rich' which plays to the wealth envy endemic in America.
The fact is, government has ZERO business in healthcare and this latest debate really has nothing to do with healthcare and everything to do with power. Politicians seize power by federalizing issues like education, homeland security, the 'war on drugs' and so on.
Do you REALLY want the same type of bureaucrats responsible for the Katrina boondoggle in charge of YOUR healthcare? Not me, brother (sister).

2007-09-23 12:23:29 · answer #3 · answered by mikey 6 · 0 0

Government run healthcare? Look at education and see how well the government has managed that one. Rather than raise taxes, Hill Girl could enlist some of her campaign fund raisers to hustle some cash for her health boondoggle.

2007-09-23 10:54:54 · answer #4 · answered by nomad74 3 · 0 1

You think the war is costing a lot? You haven't seen anything yet. There's 300,000,000 people in America and Hillary is saying that the health care system will cost 100,000,000,000. Do the math; that's $333 for each one of us. Just how much health care are you going to get for $333. I have 35 employees and it costs my Association $30 per month (not per year) for health insurance, and our health insurance isn't coming from a typical democrat bloated bureaucracy.

2007-09-23 10:54:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because she is a Democrat.
That's just what Democrats do.

(Except for JFK, he Cut Taxes for Working People, just like Reagan & Bush, in later years.)

And the Democrat Party still Hates JFK for Cutting Taxes.

2007-09-23 10:51:37 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 1 0

Our society is a perverted waste of taxpayers money and could by no ability exchange till we as individuals take back our government and start to oversee the officers we decide simply by fact no person else is supervising them. are you able to think of being waiting to hearth an elected political real whilst they screwed up? maybe if we could; considering the fact that we elected them then we could additionally concentration on an identical issues we are all bitching approximately relatively electing greater of an identical self serving representatives. "by no ability recommendations" maximum individuals are customarily self serving and could desire to care much less approximately this united states of america and its destiny. they only care approximately appropriate to the here and now.

2016-10-09 17:26:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no, no one says the federal system would be flawless. The question is to whether "ethics" would make us choose socialized medicine over capitalistic opportunism

Hillary would need to raise taxes to cover the medical plan and she knows that.

2007-09-23 10:53:07 · answer #8 · answered by MrPotatoHead 4 · 0 0

she needs to raise taxes because we are like 9 trillion in debt. As does whoever is elected, unless they just want to keep spending our children's tax dollars.

2007-09-23 10:50:31 · answer #9 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 0 1

Thats what she does best!~!

2007-09-23 10:50:50 · answer #10 · answered by Hunter 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers