should that person be representative, typical, of the people back home?
2007-09-23 10:01:37 · 7 answers · asked by amazed we've survived this l 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It would be interesting -- but problematic for two reasons.
First, if they had the "zealous duty" obligation, then they must represent the interests of their constituents above and beyond any others -- and could not compromise where the interests of their constituents would be harmed. This would lead to even more infighting and bickering.
On the flip side -- being able to be kicked out of office if they ever lie, or even misrepresent the truth by omission -- that would definitely make things more open and interesting.
2007-09-23 10:07:17 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i'm not a attorney, yet right this is my view of the area: a million) the subject-loose individual DOES have touch with the regulation, assuming that they paid interest in grade college and intense college civics training, took a motive force's preparation type, have grew to become on a radio or television of their lifetime, or listened to others having a communication approximately something as properly activities or American Idol. 2) probable 95% of the regulations do not pertain on your venture, so the probabilities of you violating them are notably small. 3) i think that stating precedent and statute are area of the technique, to not tell the decide. This places the precise regulation in question into the respected checklist, so as that this is got here across certainly if there is an attraction. The decide probable is acquainted with the regulation already, and all of the arguments linked with it. 4) If all else fails, i think which you're nonetheless predicted to act as a sensible individual. which potential in case you do not understand that a undeniable interest is prohibited, yet a sensible individual might assume that it must be, you're predicted to look at earlier you act. as an occasion, a sensible individual might comprehend that this is probable unlawful to establish a eating place of their homestead and start up charging human beings to your homegrilled BBQ rooster dinners, whether you do a solid activity with sanitation, nutrition safety, etc.
2016-11-06 04:47:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A representative or Senator should tell the people what he stands for when he's running, and then go to Washington and do that...he should not stand around taking polls and doing what will get him reelected, he should do what his conscience tells him to do and what he promised his constituents. Good luck finding any like that.
2007-09-23 10:06:35 · answer #3 · answered by makrothumeo2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Congressmen and Senators should represent the people who elected them, that is, the people of their state. However, they cannot represent their own constituancy to the detriment of the nation itself. In that sense they also represent all Americans.
2007-09-23 10:12:36 · answer #4 · answered by Don P 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They should represent their district or state. What we have are career politicians that are only worried about their kickbacks, free vacations, bribe money, and getting reelected.
2007-09-23 10:07:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Most congress people are lawyers, that is why American politics are so screwed up!~!
2007-09-23 10:06:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
They are supposed to work for us, but as we all know they are to busy stuffing their pockets with money, and trying to have gay sex in restroom stalls.
2007-09-23 10:05:57 · answer #7 · answered by masterplumber1975 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋