I have an ongoing court case, a car was given voluntarily back to the company but they are trying to say they repossessed it. I am fighting this in court and go back in November. The company gained a judgment against me but I am disputing this and the judgment against me. At the last hearing the court discharged the judgment as to quantum. What does this mean?
2007-09-23
09:26:55
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Thanks for answers so far, I was in arrears by 3 months over a 12 month period, the company would not accept increased payments to reduce the arrears in fact they would not accept any further payments as they passed it on to a credit company who made 2 appointments with me then they cancelled which made 5 months arrears. eventually they came to see me and insisted I pay 500.00 per month for 3 months which was out of the question, I asked what would happen if I voluntarily gave the car back and they said I would have the arrears and there charges to pay to which an agreement was made to pay 50.00 per month. I stopped payments when this was paid but they are now saying that the full amount of the car had to be paid. I am disputing this as I went with the advice of the representative and gave the car back voluntarily. They did not turn up at the last hearing which is when the judgment was discharged as to quantum and I have to now provide details of payments made.
2007-09-23
09:49:34 ·
update #1