English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

There are far more than just two.

Failure to act -- an omission -- will constitute a willful act where the failure to act is knowing, and where there is a duty to act.

A duty to act may arise out of statutory requirement -- such as a statute that requires people to clear a certain area around their homes to prevent fire damage -- or where there is a special relationship -- such as the guardian of a minor child or a dependent elder -- or where there is a professional obligation -- police or attorneys, for example ....

And a duty to act may arise if the defendant caused the problem which resulted in the harm, or intervened and made the situation worse than it would have been if they had never intervened.

Any of those may create a duty to act, which can result in a knowing omission (willful failure to act) being punishable, either in tort or as a criminal offense.

2007-09-23 08:56:54 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

How about ignoring a summons for jury duty and, how about aiding a fugitive?

2007-09-23 15:16:31 · answer #2 · answered by ArRo 6 · 0 0

paying taxes and being born a black male

2007-09-23 15:08:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers