One which adheres to the morals and ethics of the majority of the populace rather than of a small ruling class.
2007-09-24 07:28:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/xCETO
I think they mean the biblical definition "Marriage is a contract by which a man sells his daughter to another man" People who want to "stick to the definition of marriage" are people who do not realize that as a society we do not live our lives in accordance to the dictionary. Rather, the dictionary changes to suit how we use the language in our lives. If you don't want to change "Marriage" then I guess you can't use any of the words that have been added to the dictionary since the one you're using to define marriage. So much for using "internet" "google" "woot" "computer" "plasma" etc etc etc.
2016-03-27 03:07:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A ploy to confuse people about fairness and like we don't know what fairness is and have to ask unfair authorities. It's like a flag. If you stick it in someone else back yard it means it's yours or it's stolen 'legally'. That's justice in society. Now, the rest of the definition is all lies, which we sell out to by pretending we don't know because the teacher wants a different answer than the truth, to get grades, jobs and jelly. Still, I've got it good, so I'm not complaining, just observing possibilities. I suppose, if candidates had to take lie detector tests and actually know something to get the job, the FCC really closed down the major networks for driveling and not telling anything useful, called community service in the law or employers were held to the same standards as employees and Yahoo upheld it's spam policy on itself a little. Just a little and gave us a little of the slack instead of innocent posts referencing someones site we don't know with an ad on it as spam. Just a little objectivity instead paranoia from guilt since some of there ads are a little out of line, not much. How about electing judges or a screen in court so you couldn't see race. Or maybe putting some rich actors in jail for drugs and judges sons. The list is endless. It all stems from a breakdown in the mind and projects out onto society, so we would have to teach how to think in schools, and about fairness, and then we could all judge by now. And what is all this church hate business? I thought churches were in the love business. Philosophers ask what is truth. Try that in court. If they don't teach truth in school, then why go, what do they know? They don't want us smarter than them as that's not hard to do and we are really responsible for giving all our responsibility to someone else instead of taking it on our own shoulders and correcting them. So there. A just society is a group of just people, plain and simple. And justice requires true information and perhaps private schools, if we don't even know what truth is or how to think when we get out. Injustice is piling up faster than justice can keep up. We better find out what it is and not canned answers. Do you know that in other countries they actually spend a lot of time on getting to real answers from the students and teach them how to think about it and reach at least sensible conclusions? Oh, sure, things are great, but the price of freedom is vigilance. Ordinary citizens, the founding fathers founded this country and now citizens founder on simple questions and ponder secondary ones, not getting to the root causes. Justice is in the mind or it doesn't exist. A just society is where people have justice on their mind instead of waiting until someone breaks and blame them. A just society is where justice and truth is taught, practiced and undertood. They can't teach it if they don't know what it is and where it is.
2007-09-24 08:44:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by hb12 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
What is the definition of "A Just Society"?
2015-08-07 09:43:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋