English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

that would be our govt and president bush specifically.

bush talks about freedom and saying that iraq will take power and make decisions - until they decide that a republican friendly company like blackwater must go...

2007-09-23 07:22:07 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 7 1

Al Maliki has been ignored for a long time, thats why his oil is being taken.

This war is a shame and will continue for a long time and when it ends...in 1 year or in 10 years, the Country will fall apart on itself and be worse off than before.

2007-09-23 07:30:54 · answer #2 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 3 1

It depends on your definition of democracy. IF its they as a people get to decide what armed forces are present on their territory they you dont have Bush's version.
Bush's version of democracy is:
We brought democracy to your country and we know whats best for you. You are very welcome.

2007-09-23 07:36:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Common practice for the US govt -- so it can be any US elected official.

The US has a history of promoting the right of other countries to choose their own leaders and set their own policies -- as long as they US approves of those leaders and policies.

2007-09-23 07:31:31 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 1

Unless you have been to Iraq we really do not know what is best, I do hear from alot of military people that now that we are there we need to finish this war this time. I do know that, even if I do not agree that it should have started.

2007-09-23 07:28:34 · answer #5 · answered by Butterfly 3 · 0 4

That would be 'George "Wanted dead or alive - Bin Laden really doesn't concern me" Bush'.

2007-09-23 07:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

bushy boy's rusted tongue

2007-09-23 08:09:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers