2007-09-23 06:42:15 · 4 answers · asked by rab_noolas 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
WELL DONE..Now that's a good question !
My Answer = Nowhere to be found..because that particular case wouldn't have brought the same glam and high profile publicity as this one !!
I still think if this had been some young inexperienced unmarried couple off a local housing estate...they would have been totally CRUCIFIED ..and probably by people like the McCann's !!!
2007-09-23 07:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's up to Branson and Kennedy how they spend their wealth.
The fact that Sally Clark didn't (as far as we know) receive help of this kind is neither here nor there. In Sally Clark's case, there was an expert witness (Prof Roy Meadow) saying that the findings indicated that the babies were murdered - this is the evidence that was later discredited but at the time it was sufficient to persuade the jury. And the media. And a large portion of the public.
In the McCanns case, we don't know exactly what all the evidence is but those parts of it that have been made public have not yet persuaded me of their guilt, nor has it persuaded many others.
Debate this issue if you must but cheap digs add nothing to this discussion.
2007-09-23 09:00:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Waiting for someone who could really boost their publicity. If there isn't anything in it for them, they aren't interested. If the McCanns were unemployed and in Butlins, they would have had no help,and been spat on in the street for leaving their children alone. The class system works wonders, doesn't it?
2007-09-23 08:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by flamebolt666 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sally did not have the media on her side
the poor women lived an absolute nightmare , i agree nobody was interested in her or the other ladies distress
2007-09-23 07:25:31 · answer #4 · answered by Karl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋