http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297745,00.html
2007-09-23 06:01:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
...Damage control.
2007-09-23 09:37:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
MoveOn, like any advertiser, was out to get the best deal on rates it could. The oral representation of a salesperson on an $65,000 deal means nothing in court. If the ad ran on another day, MoveOn would not have been able to complain. It was legally stand by ad. If the salesperson violated the Time's policy, he or she should be fired.
2007-09-23 13:23:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mine is "FoxNews" is the most recognizable oxymoron in modern America.
Er uh, Fox"News" stated: " The New York Times acknowledged Sunday ..."
But here is the disclaimer at the end of Hoyt's editorial, "His opinions and conclusions are his own."
The only thing the NYT did wrong was not to tell MoveOn.org their advertisement was not GUARANTEED to run Monday. But since there was space available Monday it ran anyway and the warning was moot.
2007-09-23 13:13:15 · answer #3 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The New Yok times already has one foot in the grave, If they agreed with MoveOn.org, then we would just have to bury them completely, and They know it.
2007-09-23 13:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interestingly, this was printed and went out before the General even opened his mouth....PROOF that the Lib paper is biased...Busted!
2007-09-23 13:22:11 · answer #5 · answered by Rada S 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What can one say?
If Al Quaeda was HALF as committed to American defeat as the American left, we'd all be praying toward Mecca by now.
2007-09-23 13:25:59 · answer #6 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes, the ny times is part of the corporate media.
2007-09-23 13:11:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
THEY ARE SLOWLY COMING DOWN THE TUBES.
2007-09-23 17:06:39 · answer #8 · answered by jerry z 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋