they are tough on terrorists/war on terror? Again proving that they stand for absolutely nothing & will do anything to get elected?
2007-09-23 05:49:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Probably not. They would alienate move on dot org if they did that.
Anyway, they don't need to prove they have no consistency. Everyone with a brain knows THAT fact already!
2007-09-23 05:56:01 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, many Democratic Presidential hopefuls are actually talking about these issues without using fear as a means to hit their points home.
John Edwards wrote a great essay for Foreign Affairs and made speech entitled "A New Strategy Against Terrorism". They are already shaping their policies well before even getting into office and offering substance.
2007-09-23 14:05:12 · answer #2 · answered by Ellinorianne 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought the AMerican people voted these criminals in office last year to end the war. Looks like these idiots are following the CFR agenda as deucated people thought they would. Democrats are socialist crooks , republicans are no better do not vote on party lines vote the person and the message.
Vote for the man that is speaking these truths and knows what these crooks are trying to accomplish.
Ron Paul the hero America has been waiting for.
2007-09-23 13:00:08 · answer #3 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There only tuff on Bush so there going to have issues when they see he not running in 08>They don't have a platform other than complaining about everything an doing nothing> They like the illegals so there voting for amnesty again>While selling out the USA & citizens>And people still support them????
2007-09-23 13:05:34 · answer #4 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Democrats are sure they don't like what Bush did in Iraq. The problem they have no idea what, if anything, they would do different.
I don't think Democrats can win this election.
2007-09-23 15:38:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least Democrats are willing to change their minds and directions to come up with legitimate solutions when they get more information; unlike to other party who will steadfastly dig in their heals to stay with their misguided rhetoric from the past.
Among many other things, tens of thousands of our country men/women are dying just because of such a situation now in Iraq. Just out of stubbornness and self righteousness.
2007-09-23 12:58:43 · answer #6 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"spineless/flip flopping Dems" lol. I like to call em hair heads
2007-09-23 12:58:47 · answer #7 · answered by vern 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ah, name calling, the weapon of a 12 year old playground bully. Great work.
2007-09-23 12:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
probably but heres the confusing point..im well aware of pelosi spin, but i cant figure out how harry reid thinks unilateral surrender emboldens or brings safety to the troops...is he really that far out of touch?
2007-09-23 13:19:00 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋