2007-09-23 05:28:20 · 13 answers · asked by DON'T BURN ME 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I really meant to say liberal, but I guess she is BOTH.
2007-09-23 05:29:19 · update #1
I think it's a Yahoo glitch. I have more b/a's than that. Yupchagee isn't any longer in the top 10. Brian is #1.
It's a snafu.
2007-09-25 01:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You don't reaaaallly want to know the answer to that do you? ; )
Joking aside, I have no idea... I doubt it will last.
She has shown herself to be quite the chameleon and can change her accent and personality according to what group she's standing in front of. Despite her position at the moment, I have noticed the liberals (that I know personally)that actually pay attention to what's going on instead of parroting the media, aren't fooled or impressed by her anymore.
2007-09-23 13:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by tljessup 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know, IF we had a competent lesbian running, and IF she could get the country united, and IF she could do the job so I didn't have to cringe everytime she went out in public.
I'd vote for her anyway.
If you are referring to Ms. Clinton, shes not a lesbian, she is competent. She speaks English understandably. Right there shes miles ahead of Bush.
If you can't stand strong women without implying there is another take to their sexuality, that's on you, not her.
2007-09-23 12:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Her sexual orientation doesn't matter a bit to me, but I do find it very interesting that she suddenly reappeared.
I'm with Freethinker - inside job!
2007-09-23 20:04:06 · answer #4 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Top answerer is based on counts. It has been switching back and forth for days. Quit slandering the top answerer on behalf of the pup.
2007-09-23 13:12:32 · answer #5 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Obviously you don't believe that "quantity" equates to "quality", but is the personal attack really necessary? Besides, how is one's sexuality even relevant if they aren't sharing your bed?
2007-09-23 13:52:38 · answer #6 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We don't have to burn you, I'm sure that you'll manage to have your own soul burn in hell, for eternity.
As for the lesbian on top, I thought that they liked to be on top.
If you're speaking about Hillary Clinton, I think I'm beginning to lean toward voting for her with all of this publicity she receives on-line from people like you. With all of the hate being directed at her, she must have some good points......Republican incumbents only direct hate toward those who could actually topple their empires(well, I use that word liberally) hehe.........
2007-09-23 12:41:25 · answer #7 · answered by graciouswolfe 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋
I am sure it was an "inside" job.
2007-09-23 19:40:25 · answer #8 · answered by Freethinker 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
C. Rice was on top of Bush?
If you were made in China I would not just burn you but I will use you as toilet paper!!!
2007-09-23 12:35:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
freudian slip?
2007-09-23 12:36:25 · answer #10 · answered by secretservice 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋