And should I prefer a situation in which I get no raise and my neighbor LOSES money, simply because I hate him because he's richer than I am?
2007-09-23
04:30:34
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
http://www.nytimes.com/specials/downsize/21cox.html
http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1988/05/art1full.pdf
http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/wklyltr/el97-07.html#winners
http://www.dallasfed.org/fed/annual/1999p/ar95.html
http://money.cnn.com/2005/05/25/pf/record_millionaires/index.htm?cnn=yes
http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/28/news/economy/millionaire_survey/index.htm?cnn=yes
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/news/economy/millionaires/?cnn=yes
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Labor/bg1773.cfm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6214022/site/newsweek/
Gee alphabet soup it turns out my metaphor is right on.
2007-09-23
04:38:21 ·
update #1
Foxhound I agree that that debt-ridden neighbor way to do it is just the wrong way to do it.
But it's a gross overstatement on the part of these Lefties to suggest that every McMansion built in the 1980s and 1990s was funded with cheap money, with ARMs, and that they're ALL going to go bankrupt.
Even if it got to the point where it was 3-4% of them, that still leaves 96-97% of them who were and are just plain better off than they had been a generation ago or would be if we'd continued the economic policies of a generation ago.
2007-09-23
05:13:14 ·
update #2