Don't be daft....
....they DOUBLEHANDEDLY caused it. Alongside most other disasters to befall the world since medieval times.
2007-09-23 03:10:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wildamberhoney 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The way there going, they will be the cause of world war 3!
2007-09-23 07:53:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I believe that they were directly responsible for the Holocoust, The Great War, The Crusades, and the Peloponesian Holy wars......
2007-09-23 08:11:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brett C 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
What about the second Boer war? Back in 1897? I'm sure I saw a lithograph of them at the front line...
2007-09-23 07:59:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
What about Vietnam? I'm sure I saw Gerry napalming some villages back in 1972.
2007-09-23 07:52:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't exactly go so far as to say "singlehandedly"
2007-09-23 07:54:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jack 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
lol in this site there is world war 3 lol
2007-09-23 07:57:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
And that person on the mound that shot JFK, that was the McCanns that was!!
2007-09-23 07:58:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lady Claire - Hates Bigotry 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
There are two of them. Which one single-handedly caused the second world war?
2007-09-23 07:54:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Harriet 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
The evidence is weak, it is just rumour and conjecture, they deny it and insist they are innocent, there is nothing to connect them to it, so of course they did.
2007-09-23 07:54:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Knownow't 7
·
8⤊
0⤋