When the embodiment of death comes to pay its wishes, I have observed this week that many liberals embrace it, and normal people reject it. It is also worth mentioning that those who do evil take delight in misdirection, lies, and vague responses to specific questions. In doing so the liberals give "credit and tolerance" where "trust and verify" should actually be the policy. And in allowing this the far left in America give the impression that America is weak, not worth defending, and thusly our enemies grow emboldened as they plot their next attack upon us.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/KevinMcCullough/2007/09/23/when_evil_desecrates_the_sacred
2007-09-23 00:33:45 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
alphabetsoup...how do you negotiate with someone who says that they hate you and will whip another country off the map and come after us next??...who is not afraid to die..as a matter of fact think that he will be in heaven with virgins if he does die??....what in the heck do you say to someone like that??>.......
2007-09-23 00:43:41 · update #1
dstr...man you must be smart all them big words and all....impressive...even though you're full of crap....hope my simple words didn't offend you in any way......
2007-09-23 00:47:44 · update #2
Arvis 3...maybe you're not afraid of him because you're in your safe warm home, not being blown up by this animals IED's.....
2007-09-23 00:49:23 · update #3
How much will anyone love him if he decides to nuke us. He has made it clear he will not quit his nuclear programs. Sanctions and talking nice to him will not stop him. He is a terrorist and needs to be stopped. Not giving speeches to our university students.
And to your second question:
No! A whole new uproar will cloud over this country for his presence at ground zero would be desecrating to not only people who lost a loved one, but to all Americans.
2007-09-23 00:47:06 · answer #1 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Liberals embrace Ahmadinejad because they are always willing to give a foreigner the benefit of the doubt. However, the American is always guilty before proven innocent.
He'll try to visit ground zero. It's a way to get publicity and gain international support. It really quite clever. I just don't know about the massive security issues. I sure wouldn't want to be a New York commuter the day that guy comes to town!
Since Ahmadinejad refuses to give up his nuclear program (which we all know is for weaponry... and power), let him visit Ground Zero.
I'm sure there's still a big crater there. Just push him in and let the bulldozers roll.
2007-09-23 10:53:54 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is how liberalism deals with terrorism, appeasement and denial. I wonder what theyre going to say after our next major attack on US soil? Theyll do the same as 9/11. Use it politcally for however long they can, then drop the whole thing because it doesnt fit with their long term agendas of which defending America by going on the attack isnt one of them.
But if it could be shown that fighting terror somehow is able to raise taxes, keep abortion legal, and give us things like gay marriage, they would be on the front lines.
2007-09-24 06:58:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, by and large, Capitalism predominates in the American socioeconomic system and represents a substantial portion of our national character (or lack thereof). America embodies ruthless exploitation of humanity and the Earth. In the capitalist paradigm, human beings and the planet are simply material objects which exist to fulfill the desires of the bourgeoisie masters. Imperialism and Neoliberalism go hand in glove with Capitalism. Insatiable greed and objectification do not respect borders or boundaries.
Cruel and brutal as the United States is, imagine how ruthless it would be were the Social Darwinists of the upper stratum of our society given free rein to implement their Hobbesian vision.
2007-09-23 00:42:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can not speak for the liberals but Iran's president Ahmadinejad is trying this good will gesture to the American government and trying to mend the broken relationship, but remember when he got elected and the government said he was one of the people holding Americans hostage but yet they allow him to come to the USA, so isn't he slapping all Americans in the face.
2007-09-23 00:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not say as a Liberal myself, that we embrace Ahmadinejad at all. He is a scary guy and the fact he wants to obliterate Israel certainly isn't my idea of a good thing. However, we here in America seem to allow these sort of Diplomatic big-mouths to come in and speak their peace no matter how offensive it may be. You counter that with anti-Bush folks getting arrested at his speeches and wonder who is the bad guy after all?
2007-09-23 00:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by Rocko Barbella 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your presumption that liberals embrace Ahmadinejad is of course hyperbole. The mid-east has centuries of resentment towards the west, and, like it or not, we cannot control their thinking, we can, use diplomacy.
Iran has shown utterly no hostility towards its neighbors, and, has not used its miltary aggresively since their war with Iraq. Iranian politicians use America as an example of a nation of heathens, its true, as do "conservatives" that speak just as mindlessly of liberals.
Until Iran takes military action against America, we, must, wait...
2007-09-23 00:38:38 · answer #7 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because liberals are obsessed with the naive and childlike notion that there is good in all people and that if you just talk to people who want to kill you, then BY GOLLY they won't want to kill you anymore hyuck hyuck hyuck.
But after Ahmadinejad does us all a favour and just kills all the liberals for sport, they will all just fly off to NeverNever Land where they can spend a happy and care free eternity with Michael Jackson.
2007-09-23 00:43:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It would be a good thing if they let Ahmadindahead visit ground zero. Of course he should have to get his own security. It would be a terrible shame if he were to meet one of those random acts of violence the US is so well known for...yes, a terrible shame.
2007-09-23 00:41:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Liberals do not embrace Ahmadinejad. They, like any true American, believe he should be allowed to speak.
I have no problem with him visiting ground zero. Are we going to start making it off limits except to those that support the feeding frenzy after 911?
Peace
Jim
.
2007-09-23 00:43:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋