English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm very curious how people spin this. If you love America you must love the constitution. If you love the constitution you have to believe in free speech. The constitution doesn't say free speech for people we agree with, it says free speech for everyone. If you don't like what he has to say then don't listen, So how can you tell someone that in America they don't have the right to speak? If you think that he shouldn't be allowed to speak then do you think we should change the constitution?

2007-09-23 00:26:46 · 5 answers · asked by crushinator01 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

The problem is -- you are using logic. Many people don't.

Yes, if you cherish the Constitution, and cherish the freedoms that we have fought centuries to defend -- then those freedoms must apply even to people we don't like.

As one man said "I may hate everything you say, but I will fight to the death to preserve your right to say it." THAT is loving this country.

2007-09-23 04:22:32 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 0

What does one have to do with the other? Only a Lib could twist this a**hole from Iran coming here into a loving America debate.
A-Jad isn't a citizen of the U.S. so why should our Constitution apply to him?
His trip here is just a Dem/Lib stunt.
We should hold his camel riding butt here in jail until Iran's govt releases Americans being held in Iran.

2007-09-23 11:16:52 · answer #2 · answered by jonn449 6 · 1 1

S'okay with me if he speaks, I am just hoping he meets with an unfortunate accident while doing so...a 9mm accident would be fine.

Edit--Oh by the way, he's not an American and not entitled to the protection of the Constitution.

2007-09-23 07:33:42 · answer #3 · answered by makrothumeo2 4 · 2 1

If Adoph Dinnerjacket wasn't allowed to come here there would be no problem. Now that he is here he should be arrested and held for as long as Iran held our citizens.

2007-09-25 15:00:53 · answer #4 · answered by Robert 1 · 1 0

i guess i read the constitution in a different way...i thought it applied to only Americans, not enemy leaders...enemy leaders don't have the right to vote here, they don't have the right to pursue happiness here, they don't have a right to do anything here except speak at the u.n...THEY/ HE WISHES THIS COUNTRY HARM! HE WILL SPEW VENEMOUS PROPAGANDA HERE..HE HAS AND WILL THREATEN OUR VERY EXSISTANCE!! HE DOESN'T HAVE THAT RIGHT! NUFF SAID?

2007-09-23 07:38:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers