do you think bill clinton is responsible for 9-11?

Question

9-11 took years years to develop well before bush was in office. bin laden was caught many times and offered to bill clinton, but he refused to bring him to justice. 9-11 developed under clinton. how can people not think bill was responsible for 9-11.

Answer 1

Well, let's see. Fanatics attacked our troops in Beirut, and Clinton did nothing.
They attacked the Cole, and Clinton did nothing.
The attacked the WTC basement, and ... Clinton did nothing.
They downed Flight 800... and CLINTON DID NOTHING.

Why would they think the WTC would be any different?

Answer 2

Directly responsible as in planning and carrying it out? No. Indirectly? Yes. How many times did muslim terrorists attack our troops or interests without any meaningful response? Many. Under the administration of Bill (do nothing) Clinton. If he had responded like we were serious the threat of 9/11 may not have ever developed.
***ADD To Myles: Have you not heard the audio of Clinton giving a speech in which he boasts that he could have had Bin Laden on a silver platter but turned him down because he had "committed no crimes". He went on to say that he begged Saudi Arabia to take him but they didn't want the scum either claiming that he was too much of a "hot potato". So you are lying when you say that Clinton never had access to him. Or maybe you think Clinton was lying when he said it. Wouldn't be the first time now would it?

Answer 3

Bill wasn't responsible for 9/11, he actually fought for bulletproof doors on airplanes to prevent hijackings. Bush rescinded that on his taking office. Bush isn't responsible for 9/11, Bin Ladin is, and if Bin Ladin were so easy to catch then why, with the full force and might of the US troops, isn't he caught six years later, now that we know what hes done, and its not just a rumor in the night? Lets not forget that the first attack on the Towers during Bills White House occupancy, led to the perpetrators being caught, tried and imprisoned, where they are to this day, and the Cole bombing? They were also caught and did time in the Middle East.
But Osama is still out there, making us look weak.
That is on Bush's head. His watch, his failing.
Oh, and one other thing...the air at Ground Zero.
His administration lied about that too, and thousands of people are ill and dying from the asbestos they helped clean up with the assurances that the air was clean.

Lets not rewrite history, The Cole bombing and the First Twin Towers attack were prosecuted. they were not glossed over or forgotten, but it does seem that when the truth doesn't fit the slant some would consider that truth optional.

Answer 4

Bill Clinton is a President who failed, (in my opinion) to be a strong leader for our country and our people. Because of his past mistakes in the White House scandals and negligence in World issues, misuse of his power in the government, we (USA) became an extemely vulnerable military force, thus, all the while the "terrorists" were plotting to take over our country. We need a leader such as President Bush, who is willing to take a hold of these terrorists and show them who we are, what we represent, and who they are messing with. Our military is a force to be reckoned with. Defend our American flag and what she represents!! Preserve the freedom our Forefathers have fought for & our soldiers are risking their lives for today. Wasn't it during the Clinton admin. when prayers and God was omitted from our public schools because it offended a "foreign" student. What about our American students? Don't they matter anymore? What happened on 9/11 should not have happened. Think about it...What was Clinton doing in the White House??? For 8 years???

Answer 5

There are 3 solutions right here... one million) The censorship is of the media, and is left-wing, as a effect left financed, and could added help the leftist time table's.... 2) The above answer additionally applies to the fake commercial of each and every of the political BS to the final public. maximum every person is conscious that media merchants are that of WWF or however they call it now-- Staged for left-wing administration. every person that may not a libertarian and conservative, or the two% of 'others' void out all aspects of political correctness to alter it with propaganda that may additionally help and help their destiny 'handouts.' 3) extra time, i don't think it would have fairly mattered if Clinton released him or not. Osama might have got here across somebody to do the interest with equivalent or extra credentials. 9/11 replaced into destined to ensue. And, nonetheless Clinton's delinquent strikes in want for this actual terrorist did not something yet inflict extra beneficial injury and set-back, it replaced into particularly inevitable for the plan to be carried out... at last. --Rob USMC

Answer 6

i don't think it was bush's fault, i don't think it was clinton's fault, but yeah, bin laden has been around for a long time (anybody remember oliver north?) so in hindsight we could pin the blame on the fbi, or the military or any one of the presidents in the last couple decades, but i think that to be fairly distributed, the fault would have to sit on a lot of people and a lot of organizations- maybe all of us, what the heck. i don't think it's really wise to do that though- i think we should just learn from it and move on.

i'm not a fan of clinton, but i don't think it helps to look back at his presidency and blame his shortcomings when we have national troubles (but then, maybe i'm just full of it)

Answer 7

As much as I hate Bill Clinton, I can't put the blame fully on him. Yes he had a hand in it due to letting Bin Laden go free but he didn't know how much he was getting ready to do to the US. Yea I hate him but I don't blame him for the doings for a certifiable lunatic like Bin Laden.

Answer 8

No.

Watch this video:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918&q=aaron+jones+cancer&total=6&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

This is the closest thing you'll get to a confession from the people actually responsible. Be patient this video covers a lot of very interesting topics. It will get to the "confession". I promise!

Answer 9

Osama said in 1998 that the lack of response to the attacks in Africa, Saudi Arabia, the Cole, and the 1st WTC bombing as well as the hasty withdrawal from Somalia after less than 20 deaths showed him that he could defeat America because the American people had no will to fight- no resolve. They were planning 9/11 well before Bush took office- fact. Osama was offered to the US numerous times and we refused to take him. Sudan (of all places) offered to keep him under surveillance- we forced them to kick him out- he went to Afghanistan- the rest is history.

Answer 10

Ok, lets take a look at your facts. Yeah, Osama was developing this plan before Bush was in office, but Bush, not Clinton, was the only president to recieve intel about it. Bin Laden was caught, but he was hard enough to implicate with terrorist actions that they couldn't convict him.
Clinton is not responsible for any of these actions. Even if you believe that he was, with the knowledge that Clinton knew nothing about the attack itself, Bush deserves most of the blame for allowing it to happen. Given direct intel on the location of the attack, the method, and an idea of who was doing it, he sat on his hands and did nothing. Had Clinton been in office when it happened and done the same thing, he'd be responsible.

Answer 11

umm...wow, when Bill Clinton and Richard Clark first devised the Office of Homeland Security in 1998 to link intelligence agencies to better track organizations like AL-Qaeda it was shot down as "Too Much Big Government" by the Republican Congress. President Clinton did apprehend and have tried an convicted all those responsible for the 1993 bombing, and he was only in office for less than 6 weeks when that happened. SO that was planned under G.H.W. Bush , Should we blame him for that?

Edit: Bin Laden being Caught is a distortion of a lie a hoax. A Sudanese arms dealer said that he had access to Bin Ladens location, He wanted money and connections for dealing arms. The lead was thouroughly investigated by the CIA and reviewed by Clinton, he was not credib le and the information he gave was false.

Suspender: WERE THE HELL DO YOU GET YOUR FACTS? 1993 bombing (6 weeks in office) he apprahended EVERYONE responible they are in prison for life. As for the Cole, Do you realize how long it takes to mobalize our army it would have been impposible to do after the Cole and before he left office. He and Richard Clark had a plan and it was passed on to Bush. We needed to launch from Uzbekhistan and could not get permission. We did not get that until after 9/11 and our military could STILL NOT BE MOBILIZED it was CIA special forces led by George Tenet that took Afghanistan. Clinton's CIA Chief also stopped multiple Millenium attacks planned for 2000, remember those? It amazes me what short memories people have.

And Flight 800? That was fuel tank explosion. You believe that conspiracy theory but you probable bash people for saying 9/11 was an inside job. And your doing the same thing.