Why is yahoo answers class and race warfare today?

Answer 1

Because people can hide behind the mask of anonymity to inflict their hurts. In one way its good, because then less of that animosity comes out in the real world, and in another way, It makes the internet a nasty place. I try to be civil and imagine that I'm speaking in person.

Answer 2

This election cycle is socialisms big push for power, when we are at war and vulnerable. If they can set us against each other, this can be used as a lever to move them into positions of power.

This is it. Because we have free speech, they were revealed far faster than they wanted to be. They hid under the banner of the Democratic party, but when many in the Democratic party said, "Hey, that's not me! I'm leaving the party because the party left me!" and others said, "That's not me! I'm not that!" then the socialists were labeled as "Liberals".

Now that even some of the Liberals are saying, "Hold it! I'm not a socialist! Read the definition of "Liberal". That's me!" the socialists have been left standing in the open with no cover.

If they can't break us apart as a nation, undermine our faith in our system of government, set us against each other by race, by class, by political party, they can't get in, and likely never will after this.

If they get in, we have seen how quickly a government can be dissolved. Russia has made that very clear.

Expect more. Maybe I'm being silly.

Wouldn't it be silly to pretend I'm absolutely wrong and ignore all evidence that supported what I am saying?

Check for yourself. Look under "Split" in the Wikipedia (or other sources) under "Socialist Party of America".

Split

By the late 1960s the most powerful figures in the Socialist Party of America were Max Shachtman and Michael Harrington, who agreed upon a parallel strategy of maintaining the Socialist Party as an independent third party that fielded its own candidates, and acting as a pressure group within the Democratic Party. The party itself had become divided into three caucuses. One was the Debs Caucus led by David McReynolds, which wanted to pursue the traditional position of the Socialist Party as an independent political party and held the most strongly "leftist" position within the group. Another was the "centrist" Coalition Caucus led by Michael Harrington, which also had a leftist orientation, but wanted to work within the Democratic Party to pull it to the left. Finally, the "rightist" Unity Caucus led by Max Shachtman were strong supporters of the Lyndon Johnson/"Scoop" Jackson wing of the Democratic Party that supported hawkish anti-Communism abroad and civil rights and the Great Society program domestically.[4] [5]

It's your country. What are you going to do about it?

Answer 3

No, however the propagandists are at right here 24/7 accusing the different area of "merchandising type and race conflict." this is a tactic in which they desire to unfold that speaking factor and have it believed. Any coverage that they do unlike, alongside with restoring the best tax costs to Clinton-era stages, is "type conflict." If somebody gadgets to or factors out a racist fact, that turns into "race conflict" or "enjoying the race card." this is a low tactic designed to obfuscate. It makes use of offense as a protection whilst there at the instant are not any logical arguments to apply to preserve.

Answer 4

It always is about Class Warfare.
Welfare Democrats want us Working People to pay more taxes.

Answer 5

I haven't viewed this. Interesting, however, since if I had to bet, I'd say most users are similarly situated.

Or some are homeless and using the library computer.

Answer 6

it becomes easier for the wacko left to express their koolaid drinking fantasies on a medium without having to face anyone with more knowledge about the facts then they would like to believe

Answer 7

Not now not ever.....If you fill your life with love there is no room for hate

Answer 8

its everyday...you just hang out in the wrong sections

Answer 9

Inequality and injustice !!!

Answer 10

?


Ya got me