conservatives: do you want to bomb every country in the world that dislikes us?

Question

you keep saying we need to attack iran, because iran doesn't like the u.s.

there are many countries that don't like the u.s.; and in fact, many of them are much more capable that iran, as far militarily, to do something to us.

do you think we should bomb any country in the world that dislikes us in any way? that'd be about at least half the world.

Answer 1

Wrong. You have totally mischaracterized what conservatives have said. "Like us", "dislikes us"? What are you in junior high school or something? This isn't some popularity contest.

I am personally in favor of attacking Iran so as to destroy their nuclear capability. This makes perfect sense when you consider that they have vowed repeatedly to destroy us and our allies.

Answer 2

you are able to not fairly ask what something of the international thinks, via fact something of the international would not have a unified opinion. some international places and individuals fairly dislike U.S. conservatism; others are fairly conservative themselves and are angered through the U.S.'s shift to liberalism. this query additionally assumes that there is a different distant places coverage time table linked with conservatism. that may not inevitably authentic. whilst George W. Bush replaced into fairly interventionalist, many conservatives interior the U.S. are isolationist. Likewise, conservative evaluations on commerce selection; some sense that regulations on commerce is government interference interior the loose industry, whilst others sense that it is the government's duty to guard the U.S. against distant places impacts. ordinary, the query is plenty extra complicated than you made it sound. speaking approximately "liberalism" and "conservatism" not often gets everywhere, via fact there are this way of super form of different coverage stances that fall under each and every umbrella.

Answer 3

I think it has very little to do with the Conservatives but rather with the current foreign policy of the current government, which is Labour by the way.

The problem is that no descent politician will admit to the fact that the current foreign policy is directly responsible for increased hightened tensions between the West and other countries. They wouldn't directly admit it mainly because it would result in political suicide.

The public opinion on the street seems somewhat divided since many people simply do not wish to get involved in the one sided politics. But I would like to point out that the politically correct and most often adjusted opinion polls do not in any way reflect the REAL public opinions and feelings regarding this issue.

How many more caskets filled with bodies do we have to read about or whitness before our government will realise the truth?? I for one no longer believe that what we are trying to achieve in Afganistan and Iraq is worth it. These wars have very little to do with democracy and are in fact often have alternative motives. Dying protecting our country's interests is one thing. Dying so we can get cheap oil is completely different.

We have no right or need to be there. Whilst we try and preach our western democracy to other countries, perhaps we keep forgetting that we will always be seen as an invaders in a foreign country for few simple reasons. And whilst our governments continue to contradict themselves by going against the very same values they attempt to promote, we the general public live in fear of modern terrorism.

Answer 4

Why yes, yes we do.

Everyone.

Muhahahahahahaha!

Seriously - you really need to stop the gross generalizations. The MSM is so full of crap - I am a life-long conservative and don't know anyone who really wants to attack Iran.

But to say it will *never* happen - that's just foolish. You can't predict the future. Or do you think that, no matter what they do, we should just remain passive? Not trying to be a *****, I'm genuinely curious what you think.

Edit - Argle, that was pretty low-rent, even for you. We are all Americans. Why do you have such a blanket contempt for half the country?

Answer 5

Another ill informed ignorant liberal. I base that last statement on the fact that you feel our only reason to bomb Iran is because they don't like us.

Do you think it might have anything to do with their nuclear ambitions? Which the UN and France have lead the way in trying to stop them. France's current administration has made statements about possible military action from them.

Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that Iran is helping terrorist in both Afghanistan and Iraq?

Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that Iran's President Mahmood Ama-dumbassina-dinna-jacket has threatened the people in Israel to be "wiped from the face of the earth".

You people are all the same, you ignore the worst issues about our enemy's and then say they can be negotiated with. Wake up and smell reality buddy!

Answer 6

We need to attack Iran because Iraq isn't making terrorists Iran is

They are training and recruiting for Al-Queda. Iraq is just having a Civil War...and if it would remain that I believe if Iran and Al-Queda quit antagonizing an "ethnic cleansing" then they would eventually lose the will tho fight.

You can be naive all you want Iran is the reason the Mid east is as bad as it is. Iran wants a bunch of Iranian states but first they have to destroy individual sovereignty.
Iran is training terrorists...and their aim is getting better....

The return of the Ottoman Empire
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070922/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_us

Answer 7

Disliking? No. Wants to destroy us or our allies? Yes. If they are capable of being capable of damaging us and proclaim that intent, then we should take them out. Weapons are too dangerous to allow another Hitler or Hirohito - or Ho Chi Minh, Kim Il-Sung, Chavez, or any other wacko to get the chance to use them. Any city in America attacked by a pocket nuclear device would be uninhabitable for at least 200 years. Who wants to take a chance on that. Kill them all.

Answer 8

Umm no.. I am a conservative and I am very against use of atomic bombs unless necessary because of the effects it has on the whole world. I think the US needs to know what power the country has to fight back. If we bombed another country we just drag ourselves deeper into war. Not to mention that they would bomb us back.

Answer 9

They don't have to like us, they just have to deal with us. I agree that the US needs to have a worthy adversary rather than these little piss ant 3rd world countries that we could destroy completely if we so desired.

But you've seen it. There's always some little kid in the neighbor hood that mouths off to the biggest guy he can find and keeps doing it until he gets his butt kicked.

Well, we had to do it to Qaddafi, and Hussein and we might have to do it to that dude in Iran too.

The rules are simple- either smile and play nice or shut up and mind your own business. You don't do that you're asking for it.

Answer 10

Democrats have been saying the same thing, what's your point. You seem to have forgotten that Clinton bombed Sudan and Afghanistan so the media would stock talking about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Don't forget Vietnam

Answer 11

I don't think anyone has said we should bomb Iran because Iran doesn't like the USA. Another spittle spraying generalization that doesn't amount to a hill of beans. So one dimensional.