Why Americans have to stick up for Isreal? Don't you feel like you are being used by them. Tax payers dollars go there and you get nothing in return.
2007-09-22 09:22:08 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
OMG, can you imagine what an embarrassment that would be to the US? Bush cannot speak if he doesn't have the words all laid out for him, and half the time he screws that up! Can you imagine what would come out of his mouth, if they couldn't prep him?!
I think Ahmad... whatever is an idiot and a fanatic, but he could, with both hands ties behind his back and blindfolded, make Bush look like an imbecile.
On the other hand it might be interesting to see what would happen when the guy who cannot answer a serious question seriously meets the foreigner who hates him. A WWF Smackdown!
peanutbuttercup - Ahmad.. is anti-semitic, Bush is anti-semantic!
Honza Urban - Sad but true!
2007-09-22 09:42:58 · answer #1 · answered by Havasoo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Bush is afraid of anybody. Particularly not of some wacko from a backwater country like Iran. What would anyone gain from debating an opponent who has proclaimed his desire to destroy America and its allies? What would you learn from such a debate? What is the argument that would be the subject of such a debate?
We send tax dollars to Egypt and the Palestinians too. What do we get from them? We give tax breaks to Russia and half the world, including avowed enemies. What do we get from that? The Israelis do our fighting for us. They are our strike force in the Mideast. Better them than us. They would love to be let off the leash so they can attack Iran and Syria - and the killers in Iraq. Until we slip the leash, we have to support them. Once we let them go, our problems over there will be over. Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt only exist because we stopped the Israelis from destroying them. That was a big mistake.
2007-09-22 09:54:47 · answer #2 · answered by californiainfidel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe this is because the very purpose of a debate, the showing and sharing of ideas, would be ovepowered by monologic projections of the respective opinions. Mr. Ahmadinejad may summon his own press conferrence, and announce once again his postulates.
I think the debate would being nothing new, it would help nothing and is useless because of it.
Havasoo got the point.. may the ahmadinejad be as fanatic as he appears, he would still probably out-dispute the bush. at least he could reach the proper exit doors after the press conferrence.
2007-09-22 09:45:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As an American, i'd absolutely oppose any such debate. The President isn't wise sufficient to win. i have heard Ahmadinejad clarify himself and, nonetheless probable mendacity, he replaced into eloquent and regarded honest. it might want to be yet another embarrassing setback for the U.S. on the international degree.
2016-10-20 02:35:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our leaders do no debate other, especially from hostile countries. Give an example of when this ever happened before where we gave media coverage to a leader of a terror state like Iran.
2007-09-22 10:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why should he have to debate the president of Iran? Seriously, that's like having a debate with Hitler. I'm sorry but that man is truly unstable. As much as anyone hates the president, no one should have to put up with some antisemantic retard who can't tell his butt from his head.
2007-09-22 09:39:14 · answer #6 · answered by Peanutbuttercup 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The decision is not cowardly. It is responsible. Why on earth should the President of the United States give this terrorist any political credibility?
2007-09-22 09:49:37 · answer #7 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the Iranian president speaks better English then bush that's why
2007-09-22 10:09:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The furry one from Iran won't debate his students nor his opposition so why do give him equal status.
2007-09-22 09:41:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another Ahmadinejad apologist rears his ugly head..only hand wringing liberals would want to debate a terrorist rather than kill him.
2007-09-22 09:41:39 · answer #10 · answered by I Laugh At Morons 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋