English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this a 2-way trip?....The way there and back....? Back to what?....What is the origin of light, and what does it return to?
When light, or any radiation, gets emitted, it ultimately gets absorbed. Could the return trip be that absorption trip....?
Is this the process that keeps space-time a Constant?

2007-09-22 08:49:52 · 6 answers · asked by starling 3 in Science & Mathematics Physics

6 answers

I am not a mathematician nor a physicist, it took me some time to piece this together from my own ponderings and sketchy understanding of the topic.

Einstein's equation < e=mc^2 > shows that variable energy (e) is directly related to variable mass (m) by a constant value (c^2).

From this, I take the c^2 as indicating the impossibly massive photonic explosion (e) of (full-spectrum) radiation that would result, if you should accelerate a variable mass (m) to the speed of light.

I am only a dreamer and this does seem to make a kinda sense but my knowledge of physical mathematics is limited.

btw - if you are familiar with the idea of electrons orbiting the nucleus in rings - if you can excite an electron to jump from one ring to another, it will release some energy as photons (ie: radiation). This might create a certain instability within the electronic configuration of the atom and the electron may jump back (releasing a secondary photon)

Also, if you are familiar with the idea of conservation of energy - photonic energy is absorbed creating heat - this conversion process is not wholly perfect - the difference being considered entropy - supposedly the one thing that will eventually consume all matter.

Maybe I should get out more :D )

2007-09-23 21:17:23 · answer #1 · answered by cornflake#1 7 · 0 0

The Equation that describes Power of the motion of a moving mass is equal to the product of a moving force (due to the ineraction of mass and space structure) and the velocity that the force is moving. The Energy invested in the motion is the product of The power that cause d the motion and the time used to develop that motional Energy.

The Equation that describes the Graviational energy content that was used to assemble the mass into a structure is E=Mc^2. This Equation was published by Henri Poincare in 1901 , four year before Einstein published his theory of Special relativity.
Therefore when every a mass structure is set in motion it must shed some of its strucral mass in order to mainatin equilibrium during the interaction betweem mass and space structure.
Hence during the first period of oscillation the moving body loses and equivalent amount of mass which is relative to the kinetic energy that the power source gave motion to the object to cause its motion.
Its elaborate to explain ,but its the simplest explanation I could give,without writing a book.
Per you 2nd part of your Enquiry =light flux is a micromass radiative process. When this light flux collides with atoms inside a mass structure an absorption process takes place ,thus increasing the temperature energy of the atom and its atomic mass increase as well.

2007-09-22 10:00:07 · answer #2 · answered by goring 6 · 0 0

I suppose you are referring to E=Mc^2. That is the energy equivalent of matter. Mv is the momentum of a mass moving at veloocity = v. Mv^2 is the kinetic energy of a mass moving at velocity = v.

2007-09-22 08:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

right here in South Africa we dont have potential mess united statesdue to a loss of ability with the aid of the producing government, we've load laying off! as quickly as we've load laying off, the lights pass out. as quickly as we used to have potential mess ups, the lights went out. Whats the version? The spin yhou placed on it. whilst others are incorrect, they're incorrect. whilst they're incorrect its in basic terms a case of waiting for sparkling gentle. Isnt there a scripture that announces dont have faith a prophet if he keeps getting it incorrect? I dont placed my faith only in scripture, yet in addition attempt to make judgements in step with as extensive a documents base as achieveable. no remember in case you like it or not, cases have replaced because of the fact the bible become written and technological advances in verbal exchange, as an occasion, have replaced the say we do issues and style comments. As a toddler I heard "hundreds of thousands now residing will in no way die" keynote handle with the aid of Charles Taze Russell at a prepare in 1914. This become on an previous seventy 8 rpm vinyl.i might say that each physique people who heard him supply this communicate are lifeless. Please enable anybody make their own bungling imperfect way in the time of the international and that i'll enable u do the comparable. undergo in concepts the time, cases and a million/2 a time nonsense maths which predicted 1975? Dont be fooled into giving up your judgment in favour of theirs. Love the writer.

2016-11-06 02:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Einstein needed a big number in his equation E=MC2, the speed of light filled this bill closely enough. The rest of you question is garbled.

2007-09-22 12:23:49 · answer #5 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0 2

Was there a question here?

2007-09-22 08:57:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers