when he was proved soooooooo wrong about Saddam having any WMDs?
If the Weapons Inspectors checked and found that Iran is not making any Nuclear Bombs as Bush sez isn't it rather irresponsible for Bush to make the claims that he is making?
Or is this just proof that Bush is a couple cards short of a full deck?
2007-09-22 04:32:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Think about it...
If he accepted that no nukes were found - and no evidence of nuclear bombs being produced was "believed" by him, what would he be saying?
He would be admitting, in a round-about way that he was wrong for starting the war in Iraq.
Now I am 100000% behind our troops - and I wish that every last one of them was home right now - but just imagine what the results would have been if those same troops had all been deployed to find Osama Bin Laden...he would have been found - and the "point" that Bush is still trying (weakly) to make would have been made loud-and-clear.
But for him to admit that he was wrong - whether about Iraq or Iran - that just ain't gonna happen. Saddam made Bush's dad look like a fool - and Jr. did what he did to avenge his daddy.
I say we fire every politician from the President down to the lowest local office and start with brand new people - who have never served in politics before. Can't be worse than what we have now, could it?
2007-09-22 04:45:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since you've prefaced your questions by referring to Bush as a "POS", I assume you're not interested in real debate on the issue but only in having others validate your opinion. I don't agree with a lot of what Bush has done but I don't let that get in the way of rational debate.
If you don't know, other countries (such as France) have grave concerns about Iran's nuclear capabilities. The United States isn't the only country to call for inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities
Your argument that because we couldn't find WMDs in Iraq therefore there are none in Iran defies logic. These are two separate countries. That would be like saying because the cops thought there were illegal drugs in one building but it turned out they were wrong that no other buildings could possibly have illegal drugs in them.
2007-09-22 04:49:07 · answer #2 · answered by susandiane311 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If you read the intelligence from other countries (especially the EU) you will see the same fears. That is why they are trying to negotiate with Iran.
2007-09-22 05:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iran has been an enemy of the USA since the Iranian revolution in 1979. They have killed, directly and indirectly, hundreds of Americans, and they intend to kill more. Iran is run by fanatical, theocrats who want to spread Islamic jihad all over the world, and create an all Islamic world.
Are you foolish enough to believe that a country with all that oil really needs to build nuclear power plants to provide energy? IF you are that gullible, I have some very expensive swamp land in Florida to sell you at a very steep discount. Call me, dude.
2007-09-22 05:41:27 · answer #4 · answered by Shane 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Personally I trust Bush and his lies 100000X more than I trust what the Iranian government says. if you really looked at things you'd find out that the real warmongers are those in the Middle East, they don't want peace, they don't want democracy and they don't want free speech. They'll say anything to you to get you to believe them turn around do something else and blame it on the West and the sheep believe them.
2007-09-22 04:55:20 · answer #5 · answered by rz1971 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Chaney is probably SELLING the info to Iran!
2007-09-22 05:08:43 · answer #6 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
youve answered your own question
2007-09-22 04:38:40 · answer #7 · answered by Mossy Jan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋