my second AK trade?

Question

this is the second trade i've done with AK. how would this work? and this would also be good for utah and indy, in my opinion. give a reason for what you think. don't just tell me that i'm a moron or that it would be cool. explain.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=981~1998~617~1016~2789~434~615&teams=26~11~11~11~26~13~13&te=2421:11-2813&cash=

Answer 1

as a Laker fan, i wouldn't mind seeing this trade, but I doubt that it would because I believe that KB24 said he didn't want LO to go anywhere... Utah may do it, if only to get Kwame's expiring contract... so for those calling him stupid because of that, get your knowledge right before calling people out...and I'm pretty sure that the don't trade in conf. applies mostly to superstars as you don't want them haunting you in the playoffs...doubt that anyone loses sleep over AK47 in any game (although he can hoop, he also cries on the floor)...

All that being said that leaves the Lakers with a lot of spots to fill and ruiins there option of running a triangle offense with so many new and key pieces, doubt it happens, maybe one one but not both...

Answer 2

what on Earth would you think this trade would work? The GM in Utah would get shot if they trade away AK for a scrub like Kwame Brown. Worst of all, they give AK and J. O'Neil to the Lakers, a Western competitor.

DON"T U KNOW THE COMMON KNOWLEDGE TO TRADING??? U DON"T TRADE PLAYERS TO THE SAME CONFERENCE... i.e. KG to the Celtics, Shaq to the Heat.

If AK don't want to play for the Jazz anymore, he can return his salary and sit out his remaining contract. This is the best option instead of this wack trade that you made.

Answer 3

i think that it favors LA a lot, Utah a little simply because Kirilinko doesnt want to play there anymore. For the pacers it doesnt seem like a good/bad trade for them in my opinion, they want Bynum for some strange resason, if it was Bynum there instead of cook i think this trade could actually work for all teams. Utah is going to get rid of money buy sending out kirolinko, so it will help all teams in my opinion. Good Trade!

Answer 4

That would be the most lopsided trade ever and it would only really benefit the Los Angeles Lakers and not the Indiana Pacers or the Utah Jazz. That's why I don't see that trade happening at all.

Answer 5

obvious lakers fan arent you? only a laker fan would make a trade that nets them JO and AK and they give garbage.

i only looked at what utah was getting and i automatically knew this trade sucked. come on, turiaf and brown for AK? are you kidding? kwame sucks! he is a bust and a scrub. turiaf is ok, but he isnt AK47.
and you think indy is retarded or something? giving away a superstar and their best player for garbage? yes garbage. odom is good but he isnt an allstar type player. cook, sasha, and vlad are all scrubs.
and the lakers get away with robbery and rape here. getting 2 stars for nothing.

at least try and make a fair trade. man.

Answer 6

I'm a Laker fan and I love the trade, but even I know Utah isn't that stupid .

Answer 7

All of these kirilenko deals are bad for the jazz, unless its shawn marion or even artest i wouldnt trade him. I think kirilenko fits with phoenix and marion can play under sloan.

Answer 8

awesome trade for the Lakers. No way in Hell, that the Jazz or Pacers would take it.

Answer 9

Why do you even make trades like theese. People answer just because of points, no one really cares about you guys with trades

Answer 10

we need to pray to god that the gms will accept if yea than the lakers will bring more championships to la i luvvvvvvv this trade