Public Law 107-40 107th Congress Joint Resolution To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
2007-09-22 03:04:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why has he limited his attack to just two countries and not gone after other terrorist states .
2007-09-22 03:05:31 · update #1
Greetings. several problems with this. one. the government blocked all inquiry into the 9/11 incident and immediately surrounded the buildings that were involved with national guard troops, excluding all from the site. including the forensic people from the FBI and the State of New York. the building was first declared a National Monument, making it a federal crime to remove anything from the site, even a broken piece of concrete. then the buildings were demolished and the steel sold for scrap and the crushed already concrete shipped to China to be used in the great dam project. FBI says that there was not any evidence that the Moslems had anything to do with the attack. so Bush did not attack terrorists, since no terrorist other then our own were involved. if they were guilty, then why did not the government allow forensics in to establish that fact? You do not try to block the collection of evidence unless you know or fear that it will reveal who the real terrorist was. the innocent need not fear truth. the guilty must always do so. Check the constitution. is no where in it that says that our Congress can give to anyone the powers that are theirs. they could not give the president the power to declare war in their name. which is why we are not at war. they could not either give him the power to use our military in a personal war. that is solely the perogative of congress, not the president. it is a illegal war waged by the president and congress against the rule of law, the constitution and the people. Bush had no authority, no legal authority nor moral one to take our nation on the war trail.
2007-09-22 03:19:41 · answer #1 · answered by Rich M 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Look back at the UN resolution 1441 That stated that force was to be used to disarm Saddam. (It took 14 months so he did move them) And ALL the liberals clinton and all voted for it.
So when hillary says anything about backing any invasion, we better watch if it does not go as planned she will say "I no longer want to do this) Like a typical baby. She will say ANYTHING to get elected. She should go to HELL for all I care. Those words just might get me a violation notice if I know all the libtards on these boards. Go cry.
2007-09-22 03:19:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Congress authorized it. Clinton voted in favor of the invasion, as did Kerry and Kennedy. But I'll bet that you're willing to give them a pass.
2007-09-22 03:15:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
From the demands of the people of this planet....
we want our wifi,apple mac, ipods food clothes faster and faster and newer and newer...The crack dealer does not sell if he does not have customers...
on the other hand we need a common enemy which is terror, which lead into the next enemy the environment, that wips up fear in to all us "immortals". if we don't hear the leaders they can't lead we do....
plus every man who picks up a gun has a choice to kill or be killed....in some cases...tough choice but a choice still..
i would die for what i believe in like many of you..
thats the facts, this dis-information is bull
2007-09-22 03:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by Ian M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Himself.
2007-09-22 05:36:56 · answer #5 · answered by Unknown 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush said God gave him the authority.
As far as the public law you referenced the invasion of Iraq was a bait and switch operational technique.
2007-09-22 03:10:20 · answer #6 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The house and senate voted overwhelmingly to invade Iraq.
2007-09-22 03:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It was lawful, by UN Sanction Standards and Grievances. Look it up
2007-09-22 03:42:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Lord.
2007-09-22 03:40:04 · answer #9 · answered by douglas l 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I gave Bush the authority when I voted for him. I hope he uses that same authority to bomb Iran and Syria back to the stone age.
2007-09-22 03:25:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋