Isn't it wise of Dear Leader Bush to have private corporations killing civilians in Iraq with no consequences?

Question

I already asked this question once, I'm curious to see how the answers change now after I add my reaction to the original answers:

This question was over-the-top and mainly meant to get a rise out of Republicans, but I did find out something interesting...almost all of them made the same ridiculous argument...that if someone questions the use of of private contractors (who really are accountable to NO ONE regardless of guilt or innocence), that must mean they don't care when civilians get killed by terrorists?

Robert M: Are you this upset when one of these animals blow themselves up and kill civilians???? I bet not."

Why don't you try reading next time, thanks for proving my point!

Answer 1

You mean like the terrorists who killed all the innocent people at the WTC?

Answer 2

Here's a rise for you; lets say that you're a member of the unit guarding that convoy (which is a total fantasy!) and as you're passing an area, a contingent of supposed Iraqi police open fire on you. What are you going to do? Are you going to defend yourself, or are you going to whine like a liberal democrat and pray that they don't hurt you.

Civilians my butt, they only become civilians after they've been neutralized and the heros from the lib news agencies show up, well after the shooting has stopped.

Answer 3

Well perhaps if the libs in Congress did not tie the hands of the military we would have won by now. So let our boys kill anything with a weapon in their hands and we will not need black water to do it for us.

Typical moon bat surrender monkey

Are you this upset when one of these animals blow themselves up and kill civilians???? I bet not.

Answer 4

If "wise" you mean did he set up a back-door disavowable channel for illegal activities - yep.

If you mean wise in terms of helping bring Iraq to a peaceful conclusion - not so much.