Iran warns West against attack.?

Question

I think we should just back of and let Iran do there thing.

I dont think if we have War with Iran its going to be easy at all.

This country has a good Army , But Saying that . Attack now while there Weak Army or wait for them to make Nukes then Attack ? What would you do

Answer 1

Iran won't make a nuke, Ahmadinejad himself declared that a nuclear bomb is against islam.
You realy think you can defeat Iran? I'm Iranian and I know that Iran's military is far more advanced than you can ever think, Iran has 328 land to sea homemade missiles raedy to launch to US ships, our missiles will wreak havoc upon US bases in the whole area, Our air force is armed and ready, we build tanks, subs, planes and helicopters. btw hezbollah was using iranian uquipment and tactics and defeated israel, now multiplie that in 1000. we won't be surprised, you will give thousands of casualties and will surrender and be humiliated.

Answer 2

This is another Viet Nam or another Iraq waiting to happen. The United States is already spread too thin, spending billions of dollars for no benefit to the average American and especially no benefit to the average Iraqi. It does, however, help contribute to the ever widening gap between the wealthy and the poor.

The nuke thing in Iran sounds a lot like the WMD thing in Iraq. The administration and greedy corporations are itching to get control of oil country and make billions on support of the "war". Let's call it what it is: "An unwarranted attack on an indepedent country followed by an occupation." Don't forget how the occupiers will make a bundle on munitions and then make a bundle for Exxon as the leases are sold to privatize the oil fields.

History hasn't changed all that much. It's called empire building. The only thing we are waiting for is the CIA to stage another 9/11 so that everyone can feel good about making money for the rich.

Answer 3

The disaster may well be the two a nuke being sent to united states of america, Israel, or yet another terrorist attack occurring here. the justifications why is with the help of the fact Iran has links to China, Venezuala, North Korea, and somewhat some terrorist companies. China has the bomb and North Korea and Al Qaeda can actual get one interior of a 12 months's time. If we attack Iran, what's going to take place would be a domino bring about a damaging experience. merely like Iraq, we can then be ambitious terrorist communities in Asia and the middle East to attack us, and that they'll. Iran has an extremely risky chief, yet he additionally has many allies. If we attack, a sort of allies will strike back, and that they are going to confirm to reason yet another 9/11. it is a topic that must be dealt with diplomatically, and so a approaches, Bush has refused direct talks with Iran, that's a mistake. If he has refused direct talks yet is thinking protection tension action, we can assume yet another attack and to have many enemies. And for the individuals advocating a throwdown of Iran's chief, this guy replaced into ELECTED, he did no longer assume means like Saddam did. To overthrow him may well be to insult the Iranians, and then hell will wreck loose with them.

Answer 4

I don't think there are any easy answers in the middle east. Just think of all the good we could do with the money we're pouring into the present wars.

Answer 5

Our Military would bring them to their knees in about two weeks.
But then we would have to rebuild their country also.
If we hit them leave them that way and let their own people rebuild it, and get a new leader that wont shoot his mouth off about wanting to kill all of the Westerners or infidels as they so lovingly call us.

Answer 6

i would say lets just get ready for another whirl wind we haven't learned from Iraq have we ? it would be the worse mistake we would ever make

Answer 7

they should study what happened to their neighbor, before they open their big mouth.