English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/2007/09/21/2007-09-21_hillary_clinton_im_not_a_lesbian.html
Hillary Clinton officially declared she's not a lesbian - not that there's anything wrong with that.

Do you believe her?

2007-09-22 01:42:19 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

Are u jealous? don worry cute blond like u won b alone for long.

2007-09-22 02:00:59 · answer #1 · answered by iceman 7 · 0 6

It doesn't really matter (at least in this day and age) if she's a lesbian or not....she's a Liberal and that's bad enough. However......If she does get elected President, and she is a lesbian, she will be the first homosexual President! (that we know of) We thought America had scraped the bottom of the barrel morally when so many Americans saw nothing wrong with the President of the U.S. having sex with someone other than his wife. (other than just plain marital infidelity) Electing a homosexual President would give new meaning to the term "Defining deviancy down"!

2007-09-22 09:45:26 · answer #2 · answered by Keith T 2 · 0 0

Gay, not gay. Who knows.

I do think if there is a vote to be had in it -----she and Bill both have the history of being very self serving opportunistic sharks.

"hey maybe gays will vote for me if they think..."

"hey, maybe Jews will vote for me if I keep kissing their behinds"

"hey maybe wronged women will vote for me because I'm married to a cheater"

If there is an opportunity, the Clinton's will take it --- and we've let them !!!! So hey, I don't find it hard to believe she may have garnered a few votes among the gay community over the years.

Doesn't make her a lesbian -- just a shark.

2007-09-22 09:13:41 · answer #3 · answered by dr311 2 · 2 0

It doesn't really matter to me whether or not she is or isn't lesbian.

My main concern is her going back and forth from being Secular Progressive to being a centrist then back again.

If she can't make up her mind what she is, there isn't much that comes out of her pie hole that I do believe that she says.

As far as I'm concerned she is just whacked out. Period.

ADD-
I agree with Gabriel. She is asexual. Just like worms are.

2007-09-22 09:09:12 · answer #4 · answered by scottdman2003 5 · 0 0

I have to wonder why she would go out of her way to announce that she's not gay. Of course I'm sure some wonder,including those like myself who think her marriage is more like a business partnership between two like minded power hungry people. Which would explain why Bill has been able to have affair after affair for the entirety of their marriage with no complaints from Hillary.

Couldn't really care if she was gay though,that wouldn't keep me from voting for her. The fact that she's a socialist, power hungry,lying,manipulative witch would probably keep me from voting for her though. The Republicans would have to put up Ahmadinejad as their nominee for me to vote for Hillary.

Jack

2007-09-22 08:54:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

In the grand scheme of things, does it really matter? I am more concerned with a persons stand on issues (I disagree with Hillary a lot) than allusions to their repressed sexuality.

2007-09-22 11:54:08 · answer #6 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0 0

So we are supposed to believe that Bill doesn't inhale and Hillary isn't a lesbian. How funny liberals are to say Bush lies.

2007-09-22 09:14:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Hillary is one of them "asexuals" that don't need sex of anykind. Notice I didn't;t say Celibate for those are normal sexuals that just abstain. No Hillary is indeed an asexual being, one of the first of he&& uh excuse me, one of the first of its kind!!! News Flash! News Flash!

2007-09-22 09:30:00 · answer #8 · answered by Gabriel Archangel 3 · 1 0

Perhaps you should open the closet door of some of your fellow Republicans and supporters: Mark Foley, Tim Haggard, Larry Craig and Ann Coulter.

2007-09-22 09:11:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

It isn't her sexuality that Interests me. It is where she would lead this country, and that would be down the toilet to socialism and the downward spiral to communism. She would then be the all powerful Hitlery that would be doom for all of us!

2007-09-22 09:03:45 · answer #10 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 4 0

Wow. She's really getting the hard hitting questions. Granted it's a gay/lesbian magazine but shouldn't we be finding out more about her plans for our country is she wins?

2007-09-22 08:55:36 · answer #11 · answered by Splitters 7 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers