Just in case anyone would care to read the articles that will be twisted to suit today, no doubt:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/09/22/police-beat-my-daughter-when-her-little-girl-vanished-89520-19829975/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/09/21/mccann-witness-tells-of-kate-s-distress-89520-19823489/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/09/22/mccanns-how-madeleine-was-taken-89520-19829472/
I know there will be silly, petty people who will focus on this being from the media, whose accuracy is in doubt, likewise the neglect thing will be repeated, yet again. However this is not about points, or bum licking any cyber buddies. Try and say something that hasn't been said by the couple of sad, lonely individuals who have a multitude of identities, kept to cause misery, offend, give thumbs down, but mainly attract attention.
What are your thoughts about the contents of these articles?
2007-09-22
00:05:35
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
shambo, always there with his grubby little hand in the air, Miss, Miss, me miss, I know. Always begging for attention, any attention, it's quite sad really. I won't bother with your link.
smile: I don't understand what you're trying to say, sorry.
philip: You were not there, you look silly making it a statement and not an opinion
debi: It puts pressure in the wrong place, it deflects the attention away from finding Madleine, it puts the focus on the McCanns instead, don't believe that the baying for Gerry and Kate McCanns blood has no consequences, that would be naive
2007-09-22
00:28:19 ·
update #1
justmeback, sorry weedking: Do you speak to all women in such a filthy way?
2007-09-22
00:31:37 ·
update #2
claire: look up the meaning of hindsight
bugger Do you really believe they would be better parents if they remained silent and let their missing little girl fade into the background? I never said, or hinted that any source is more accurate than another, you're not really a facts sort of man are you
2007-09-22
00:40:29 ·
update #3
clair, calm down, bugger, (abbreviated) is the person who answered after you. Don't call people names, you make yourself look bad and unreasonable. We will also have to disagree in what we believe would be our strategies. I would want as many people as possible knowing what my child looked like, in as many places as possible and for as long as I could possibly keep it going.
2007-09-22
01:11:41 ·
update #4
jacket: Just exactly what is meant by your answer? Is it supposed to make me feel something? illicit an emotion? I just think it makes you look angry and stupid. I hope you don't have a wife, girlfriend, or worse still children if you speak like that, that would be sad.
2007-09-22
01:59:17 ·
update #5
If feel nauseated after seeing some of these resposes. Its hard to respond to an interesting point when some of these sickos pop up to spew their hatred. What lives you people must lead.
And i feel so guilty that whatever the outcome of Maddies disappearance is, that in the years to come will we probably not firstly remember that child has been through a nightmare, or hold our children tighter, change laws, restrict movements of sex offenders. No the first thing i will probably remember is that when she went missing is so many ordinary people turned into monsters. Monsters who could laugh at the situation, say evil things, and post disgusting messages like that.
The people who post messages of support for Maddie (and i dont mean so called Team Mcann supporters), and focus on that child who may well still be out there somewhere gives me hope for humanity.
Sorry Freethinker.
2007-09-22 03:01:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tartan Duck 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
These links most certainly gives food for thought to the anti team. Another perspective on the case. Very much how we have said in the beginning. There was always another scenario that should have been taken into account. This scenario is just as much likely, if not more likely, to have happened the night Madelaine disappeared, rather than her parents murdering her. The press/media are the ones putting so much focus on the McCann's. A lot of people seem to think it is they, who are personally pushing themselves forward for all this attention when in fact it is press/media who are doing so.
Why can't they just leave the couple alone and help them find their daughter instead of hounding them for imaginary faults.
Is it wrong of them to want the focus put back onto Madelaine?
Is it wrong of them to want to pull out all the stops to find her?
Is it wrong of them to use all the resources available to them even if they are well known or famous?
If I was in their position and I knew all these people or they offered to help. I wouldn't turn it down either.
Shambo's offering is just one of the sick jokes that these people are having to put up with and how sick society is today that this sort of person roams our streets.
2007-09-22 08:48:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hi Freethinker, the last link about Madeleine being taken to order is exactly what i've felt from the start of this sorry story.
Shambo you are a waste of space.
Justmebackagain, you are a hypocrite, you don't care about children, you want all Gypsies dead, I take it that means the children too.
You called Scary Mary a spastic, do you consider spastic children in the same sick derogatry way.
You are a dope head, and proud of it,what way is that to bring your children up?
Jackethead, try Potatohead.
2007-09-22 08:34:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
She claims, the witness said.........blahhhhh blahhhhhhh blah!!! What exactly is this proving?? As for the last article, now he's decided the 'abductor' was in the room when he was checking on his children? He cant have done a very damn good job on checking on them firstly, and secondly, if you suspected someone was anywhere near your children you wouldnt walk back out that door LEAVING them to go and have a merry old time with your friends.
Firstly no, because I am not a man you imbecile.
Secondly, at what point did I say they'd be better off letting her fade into the background. If you suspected someone was near your children you would stay with them, that is common sense. The fact that he is just coming out with this story NOW 4 months later (hindsight you're having a laugh love!) just goes to show the amount of thought they put into the safety of their children.
I would want as many people as possible to know also, but I would be able to stick to the one story. Unfortunately, all the covering up the McCann's have had to do has made them look suspicious along with their body language during interviews etc.
2007-09-22 07:25:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
Freethinker you can't reason with the likes of some on here, so I would not bother, they are trolls who don't give a monkeys. They can answer their own questions among themselves-birds of a feather flock together- you know
They are mostly bullies who obviously hate themselves.
i sometimes have to laught at their attempts to shock, intimidate and bully on here.
The investigation is focusing nicely.
Jackethead-try saying that to a Skinhead-face to face!!!
The contents of the articles are newspaper stories, some half truths maybe.
2007-09-22 08:12:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Plato 5
·
7⤊
1⤋
Well said freethinker, I note you have one of the worst haters replying to your excellent question. Fake videos are a load of BULL and no answer to facts. The nasties have already been shown to be wrong. Shambo's "contribution" just shows what BSE does to the brain
2007-09-22 09:21:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by London Man 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
Sorry freethin this is not answering your question but once again directed at that sick, unintelligent, arrogant individual Shambo. I hope his answer is not removed because I would BEG everyone to look at the link he refers to. This pathetic excuse for a human being just makes me sphew. After we have all been satisfactorily disgusted with him lets get him removed from Yahoo for good........as least until he reappears under a different name!
Thoughts on the articles Freethin certainly shows things in a different light but I am genuinely confused which articles from what sources are accurate and reliable.
2007-09-22 07:31:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ms Mat Urity 6
·
8⤊
4⤋
They unleashed the media beast. Too late to cry now it's starting to bite them on the a'rse. If they don't want the eyes of the world on them, why go so public in the first place? You can't have your cake and eat it.
I like your idea that all the pro-Mcann stories will be true and all the anti-Mcann stories will be "twisted".
2007-09-22 07:27:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Deja Vu!! Is there some kind of vendetta going down here folks???
2007-09-22 07:13:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
well done girl ive not been on here long but its the same idiots that keep popping up spouting crap they know who they are and i think they have nothing better to do than create sicko web films and make jokes!
2007-09-22 12:49:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Agent Zero® 5
·
2⤊
1⤋