The Universe is full of life? True or false?

Question

Yes a man died and seen Jesus and asked that Q and Jesus said yes ,,the universe is ful of life. the guy who died is a christian he was resusitated.

Interesting answers,so far, the universe (space)isn't just our solar system,,its vast ..infinite,science hasnt even come close,so the guy that says space couldnt support life,is thinking inside the box!

Answer 1

I find it hard to believe that out of all those billiontrillion stars that not one of them has life on a planet revolving around it. And, if you pay attention to some of these things that get covered up real quick, Roswell, etc, you see that things only get more complicated as you get deeper. Too cliche for you?

Ok, try Starchild on for size then. A woman found a skull out in the desert a few years ago, thought it was cool, kept it, and when she died, it was donated to science. A curious person saw and noticed that it was out of proportion to be a human skull, but too big and the wrong shape to be a monkey. Now, get this: The skull bone is thinner than any other animal's on earth, and instead of the composition of earthly bone, it weighs about half as much, is many times stronger, and has a completely different composition. Go purchase the book Starchild, by Lloyd Pye. It's crazy.

And besides all that, if aliens don't exist, who else steals the socks out of the dryer? XD

Answer 2

Well guys, in my opinion if light travels 186,000p/sec from the center of the universe and God made everything in 6 days. The universe would have to be VAST. Traveling at the speed of light for one day to form the earth would be quite a long time for a lot of the other solar systems and to believe that we are the only sentient species out here has got to be the biggest bunch of malarkey anyone ever spouted. Religious belief aside, intelligent life had to have formed long before Earth was a twinkle. Keep the questions coming. I really like the way your minds work!

Answer 3

We don't know for sure, but the chances, of life forming spontaneously like it did on earth, are good! There is also the less likely possibility that life could have arrived on earth from a comet, but this also means it most probably started spontaneously elsewhere.

Mixing the most basic elements that were present on the early earth, and applying the same conditions as was on earth when scientists predicted life may have arose, leads to the forming of simple proteins. Some of which, if given enough time would be capable of making crude copies of itself, just as DNA does.

This famous experiment, performed by Stanley L. Miller, recreates the early earth; the results of his experiment were nothing short of spectacular. He showed that if you mix the chemicals present on the early earth and apply the same conditions you can make amino acids. Given enough time, say 3.7 billion years or the amount of time it is estimated that life has been present on earth, you would probably end up with something like a human, or a cat.

Answer 4

I don't know about life, but it's full of energy which according to newtons third (I think) law of thermodynamics 'can never be created or destroyed'.

Of course at the same time you have to consider that space is basically a huge vaccum with no air or density or direction or time. Just a vast emptiness. However, recent scientific research has shown that even in a vaccum activity can take place.

Answer 5

False, the Universe has a vast amount of space that can not sustain life. While there may be other forms of life on various planets, the universe itself is not full of life.

Answer 6

We would be foolish to believe that we are THE only planet in the universe capable of sustaining life. Besides, there has to be a place the Incas and other super intelligent peoples went.

The universe IS life!

Answer 7

False. Planets represent a tiny fraction of the volume of the universe.

Answer 8

"they do no longer understand what percentage galaxies we've got here upon..." who's "they?" Astronomers understand precisely what percentage -- they're all cataloged, named, defined, and so on. i visit point you to on line variations of galaxy catalogs in case you want. For some "astronomy professor" to assert that shows stunning lack of information. "microscopes" are not from now on used to do astronomy. Telescopes are. And we *have* "seen decrease back" about 13.5 billion years of the universe's 13.8 billion 365 days existence -- even as galaxies were forming. back, your statement (or that of this meant "professor") shows very a lot of lack of information of technology. Is it "plausible" there's a god of a few type accessible? certain. this is in any respect conceivable? no longer in besides, because there is not any info of any such element. This claimed "god" of yours replaced into initially reported to be interior the clouds some miles up. Exploration and statement confirmed there replaced into no such element. Then it replaced into claimed to be only outdoors our image voltaic gadget -- nope, no longer there both. Now you're all the way down to "properly, area is enormous, so isn't it plausible it might want to correctly be accessible someplace?" quite unhappy "god of the gaps" idea. you've not given every person who thinks a "reason to believe." extremely stupid arguments from lack of information and incredulity are motives to push aside claims about magical gods, no longer believe them. Peace.

Answer 9

What Planet do you come from! This one heck yea it does! Does you planet have any kind of life in it? How far away are you from earth!!

Answer 10

universe meaning from Webster's;the whole body of THINGS observed or ASSUMED: COSMOS so it is a whole body of things... not the space in itself but things possessing the space.The universe posses a whole body of things that can have life on these bodies COSMOS...YES is the answer...